Citation network
Codd Vs. Velger
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 22, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 624 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Codd v. VelgerSearch
-
U.S. 624 (1977) Codd v. VelgerSearch
-
to consent to the release of such information if they wished to be seriously considered for other employment. Velger v. CawleySearch
-
F.2d 334 (1975). We granted certiorari sub nom. Cawley v. VelgerSearch
-
whether the circumstances of its apparent dissemination were such as to fall within the language of Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
U. S. 564 , 408 U. S. 573 (1972), and Bishop v. WoodSearch
-
is whether, if he did commit the act, his parole should, under all the circumstances, therefore be revoked. Morrissey v. BrewerSearch
-
creation and disclosure of the file report otherwise amounted to stigmatization within the meaning of Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
by his former employer at which he would have the opportunity to refute the charge in question. Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
The opinion of the District Court on this point reflects a proper understanding of Roth, supra, and of Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
information in his employment file, information later disseminated to a prospective employer. Under Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
the burden shifts to the wrongdoer to demonstrate that any such interference was strictly harmless. Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Mt. Healthy City Board of Ed. v. DoyleSearch
-
of an established constitutional right. As with any infringement of an intangible constitutional right, e.g., Nixon v. HerndonSearch
-
It would also be a departure from Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
A hearing my establish that such a deprivation of liberty is warranted because the charges are correct. But Bishop v. WoodSearch
-
of liberty, because it was not associated with the termination of Page 429 U. S. 634 employment. Paul v. DavisSearch
-
perfectly clear that the charge is true, the Constitution requires that procedural safeguards be observed. Cf. Groppi v. LeslieSearch
-
Anti-Fascist Committee v. McGrathSearch
-
as that term is used in Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
itself as demonstrating that future release to employer would bar respondent from obtaining employment. Velger v. CawleySearch
-
United States v. RealSearch
-
merit to the property claim to justify a remand to the Court of Appeals with directions to consider it. In Bishop v. WoodSearch
-
standard. In re Going v. KennedySearch
-
Talamo v. MurphySearch
-
of falsity. I recognize that there is authority for the view that falsity is an element of the violation. See Sims v. FoxSearch
-
F.2d 857, 863-864 (CA5 1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011. Cf. Paul v. DavisSearch
-
U. S. 693 , 424 U. S. 709 -710 (describing Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
Similarly, since disclosure of the charges is also part of the deprivation of liberty, Bishop v. WoodSearch
-
See Judge Tone's thoughtful discussion of this problem in Hostrop v. BoardSearch
-
is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.' United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Zenith Corp. v. HazeltineSearch
-
that respondent would have obtained a job except for the contents of his file. Velger v. CawleySearch
-
In Arnett v. KennedySearch
-
In In re Going v. KennedySearch
-
s decision to discharge a prabationary police officer. 38 N.Y.2d at 639, 345 N.E.2d at 547. See also In re Farrell v. NewSearch
-
Cf. Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
party prevailing below need not argue the merits of claims the lower court failed to reach. See generally Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Codd v. VelgerSearch
-
Velger v. CawleySearch
-
Cawley v. VelgerSearch
-
of Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
and Bishop v. WoodSearch
-
Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
and of Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
Under Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial