Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Nlrb Vs. Pipefitters

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 22, 1977

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

70 entries 2 linked 68 unlinked
Show
  1. Udall Vs. Tallman US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
  2. National Woodwork Mfrs. Assn. Vs. Nlrb US Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1967
  3. U.S. 507 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court NLRB v. Pipefitters
    Search
  4. U.S. 507 (1977) National Labor Relations Board v. Enterprise
    Search
  5. a legal promise in a collective bargaining agreement is inconsistent with the statute as construed in Carpenters v. NLRB
    Search
  6. to assign, is invalid as a matter of law because it fails to comply with the standard of National Woodwork Mfrs. Assn. v. NLRB
    Search
  7. union's demand, the employer would have to cease doing business with another employer. National Woodwork Mfrs. Assn. v. NLRB
    Search
  8. b)(4) unfair labor practice charge. This approach is untenable under the Act and our cases construing it. Carpenters v. NLRB
    Search
  9. secondary employer notwithstanding any private agreement entered into between the parties. See National Licorice Co. v. Labor
    Search
  10. the courts should defer to the agency's understanding of the statute which it administers. See Bayside Enterprises v. NLRB
    Search
  11. NLRB v. Boeing
    Search
  12. NLRB v. United
    Search
  13. e). See NLRB v. Babcock
    Search
  14. Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  15. Consolidated Edison Co. v. Page
    Search
  16. The pre- and post-1959 developments are fully canvassed in National Woodwork Mfrs. Assn. v. NLRB
    Search
  17. e). This finding, consistent with prevailing law, was not challenged by the union. See, e.g., NLRB v. Amalgamated
    Search
  18. Employing Lithographers of Greater Miami v. NLRB
    Search
  19. b)(4)(B). See George Koch Sons, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  20. SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  21. Corp., 318 U. S. 80 , 318 U. S. 95 (1943). This rule has not been disturbed. See FPC v. Texaco
    Search
  22. FTC v. Sperry
    Search
  23. ICC v. Clyde
    Search
  24. to obtain work that was not within the struck employer's power to award. See Ohio Valley Carpenters Dist. Council v. NLRB
    Search
  25. NLRB v. Int'l
    Search
  26. United Assn. of Journeymen v. NLRB
    Search
  27. NLRB v. Enterprise
    Search
  28. United Assn. of Journeymen v. NLRB
    Search
  29. Fourth Circuit, in a well reasoned opinion, has expressly sustained the Board's control test. George Koch Sons, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  30. F.2d 323 (1973). The Ninth Circuit has done the same. See Associated General Contractors of California v. NLRB
    Search
  31. F.2d 433 (1975). But see Western Monolithics Concrete Products v. NLRB
    Search
  32. to the District of Columbia Circuit's opinion in the present case, see Local No. 636, United Assn. of Journeymen v. NLRB
    Search
  33. American Boiler Mfrs. Assn. v. NLRB
    Search
  34. NLRB v. Local
    Search
  35. F.2d 105 (CA3 1968). The First Circuit has said the same thing in dictum. Beacon Castle Square Bldg. Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  36. giving the cutting and fitting work to its own employees or giving it to the door manufacturer. Cf. Fibreboard Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  37. union had on Frouge would have had an incidental effect on persons with whom Frouge had commercial dealings. Cf. NLRB v. Operating
    Search
  38. influence another employer by inducing the struck employer to cease doing business with that other employer. See NLRB v. Denver
    Search
  39. Bldg. Council, 341 U. S. 675 , 341 U. S. 689 (1951). See also Wilson v. Milk
    Search
  40. Riverton Coal Co. v. United
    Search
  41. NLRB v. Milk
    Search
  42. provision in the parties' collective bargaining agreement is patently precluded by National Woodwork Mfrs. Assn. v. NLRB
    Search
  43. but the Court adopts it. II The Court's result cannot be squared with National Woodwork Mfrs. Assn. v. NLRB
    Search
  44. is irrelevant to the determination of whether the union exerted primary or secondary pressure, relying on Carpenters v. NLRB
    Search
  45. Id. at 386 U. S. 640 . See also Fibreboard Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  46. renumbered by the Landrum-Griffin Act of 1959. For the history of these provisions, see National Woodwork Mfrs. Assn. v. NLRB
    Search
  47. to take advantage of them, the premise of the Board's argument falls. Cf. Local 74, United Brotherhood of Carpenters v. NLRB
    Search
  48. in this Part. MR. JUSTICE STEWART, dissenting. I disagreed with the Court in National Woodwork Mfrs. Assn. v. NLRB
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court NLRB v. Pipefitters
    Search
  50. National Labor Relations Board v. Enterprise
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial