Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Complete Auto Transit, Inc. Vs. Brady

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 07, 1977

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

48 entries 5 linked 43 unlinked
Show
  1. Colonial Pipeline Co. Vs. Traigle US Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1975
  2. General Motors Corp. Vs. Washington US Supreme Court · Jun 08, 1964
  3. ingels Vs. Morf US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1937
  4. Northwestern Cement Co. Vs. Minnesota US Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1958
  5. Spector Motor Service, Inc. Vs. O'Connor US Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1951
    Relied / Followed
  6. U.S. 274 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady
    Search
  7. U.S. 274 (1977) Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady
    Search
  8. against interstate commerce, and is fairly related to the services provided by the State. Spector Motor Service v. O'Connor
    Search
  9. U. S. 100 , 421 U. S. 101 (1975), quoting Memphis Gas Co. v. Stone
    Search
  10. in the State may not be applied to an activity that is part of interstate commerce. See, e.g., Spector Motor Service v. O'Connor
    Search
  11. Freeman v. Hewit
    Search
  12. Western Live Stock v. Bureau
    Search
  13. as a trap for the unwary draftsman. II The modern origin of the Spector rule may be found in Freeman v. Hewit
    Search
  14. The narrowing of the rule to one of draftsmanship and phraseology began with another Mississippi case, Memphis Gas Co. v. Stone
    Search
  15. of engaging in commerce that is interstate was reaffirmed in Spector Motor Service v. O'Connor
    Search
  16. either type is not prohibited by the Commerce Clause. The Spector rule was applied in Railway Express Agency v. Virginia
    Search
  17. in the result, upheld the reworded statute as not violative of the Spector rule. Railway Express Agency v. Virginia
    Search
  18. commerce so long as the tax does not create any effect forbidden by the Commerce Clause. In Northwestern Cement Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  19. unsatisfactory operation of the Spector rule is well demonstrated by our recent case of Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle
    Search
  20. Appeal invalidated the Page 430 U. S. 286 tax as violative of the rule of Spector. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Mouton
    Search
  21. Again, the Court of Appeal held the tax unconstitutional as applied to the appellant. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Agerton
    Search
  22. Accordingly, we now reject the rule of Page 430 U. S. 289 Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. O'Connor
    Search
  23. See Boston Stock Exchange v. State
    Search
  24. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  25. U. S. 290 (1937). See also Standard Steel Co. v. Washington
    Search
  26. Rev. Dept., 419 U. S. 560 (1975), and Clark v. Paul
    Search
  27. view in Freeman v. Hewit
    Search
  28. General Motors Corp. v. Washington
    Search
  29. Memphis Gas Co. v. Stone
    Search
  30. underlie that debate, were evident in prior opinions. Compare 82 U. S. 15 Wall. 284 (1873), with Fargo v. Michigan
    Search
  31. and compare Disanto v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  32. U. S. 34 (1927), and Cooney v. Mountain
    Search
  33. States Tel. Co., 294 U. S. 384 (1935), with Western Live Stock v. Bureau
    Search
  34. against interstate commerce, and of a lack of relationship to the services provided by the State. See Freeman v. Hewit
    Search
  35. U.S. Supreme Court Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady
    Search
  36. the State. Spector Motor Service v. O'Connor
    Search
  37. Spector Motor Service v. O'Connor
    Search
  38. Railway Express Agency v. Virginia
    Search
  39. the Commerce Clause. In Northwestern Cement Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  40. of Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle
    Search
  41. of Spector. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Mouton
    Search
  42. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Agerton
    Search
  43. Standard Steel Co. v. Washington
    Search
  44. and Clark v. Paul
    Search
  45. Fargo v. Michigan
    Search
  46. Disanto v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  47. and Cooney v. Mountain
    Search
  48. the State. See Freeman v. Hewit
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial