Citation network
Juidice Vs. Vail
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 22, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 327 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Juidice v. VailSearch
-
U.S. 327 (1977) Juidice v. VailSearch
-
the contempt citations or the short periods of incarceration that would entitle them to injunctive relief. Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
U. S. 331 -333. 2. The District Court erred in enjoining enforcement of the contempt procedures. Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
their federal claims in the state proceedings, and no more is required to invoke Younger abstention. Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
action in light of our decisions in Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 37 (1971), and Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
or controversy requirement associated with Art. III, to seek injunctive relief in the District Court. North Carolina v. RiceSearch
-
decree continued. 420 U.S. at 420 U. S. 598 . That plaintiff accordingly had the requisite standing. O'Shea v. LittletonSearch
-
See Ellis v. DysonSearch
-
state courts. Since Ward and Rabasco have standing, and since their standing, unlike that of the plaintiff in Steffel v. ThompsonSearch
-
three Courts of Appeals have applied Younger when the pending state proceedings were civil in nature. See Duke v. TexasSearch
-
Lynch v. SneppSearch
-
court cannot, of course, interfere in a case where the proceedings were already pending in a state court. Taylor v. TaintorSearch
-
of those cases. The contempt power lies at the core of the administration of a State's judicial system, cf. Ketchum v. EdwardsSearch
-
The District Court relied upon our decision in Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
by the equitable Page 430 U. S. 337 restrictions on federal intervention in state prosecutions, Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
be accorded only an opportunity to fairly pursue their constitutional claims in the ongoing state proceedings, Gibson v. BerryhillSearch
-
that they are enforcing the contempt procedures in bad faith or are motivated by a desire to harass. Cf. Cameron v. JohnsonSearch
-
Rudd v. RuddSearch
-
the possibility, of future contempt orders, none of the appellees, excepting Ward and Rabasco, have standing. O'Shea v. LittletonSearch
-
Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
Vail v. QuinlanSearch
-
Toucey v. NewSearch
-
serves, of course, to vindicate and preserve the private interests of competing litigants, People ex rel. Munsell v. CourtSearch
-
in aid of the authority of the judicial system, so that its orders and judgments are not rendered nugatory, Ketchum v. EdwardsSearch
-
Gompers v. BucksSearch
-
King v. BarnesSearch
-
appear settled in New York whether persons faced with civil contempt will be assigned counsel if indigent, see Rudd v. RuddSearch
-
suit seeking only such relief in the District Court. Cf. Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE STEVENS, concurring in the judgment. The major premise underlying the Court's holding in Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
act if the alternative legal remedy is inadequate. Indeed, the major premise underlying the Court's holding in Mitchum v. FosterSearch
-
is inappropriate. I am less certain about the possible applicability of Pullman abstention, Railroad Comm'n v. PullmanSearch
-
appellees will have suffered the harm they seek to avoid before the state proceeding is concluded. Cf. Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL joins, dissenting. I dissent. My earlier dissent in Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
however, my strong disagreement with the process begun in Huffman, carried to the extreme in last Term's Paul v. DavisSearch
-
Even if the extension of Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
England v. LouisianaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Juidice v. VailSearch
-
and Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
the District Court. North Carolina v. RiceSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial