Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

ingraham Vs. Wright

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 19, 1977

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

52 entries 17 linked 35 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Barnett US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1964
  2. Greene Vs. Mcelroy US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1959
  3. Furman Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1972
  4. Gregg Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1976
  5. Trop Vs. Dulles US Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1958
  6. Louisiana Ex Rel. Francis Vs. Resweber US Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1947
  7. Howard Vs. Fleming US Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1903
  8. Wilkerson Vs. Utah US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1878
  9. Bugajewitz Vs. Adams US Supreme Court · May 12, 1913
  10. Morrissey Vs. Brewer US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1972
  11. Estelle Vs. Gamble US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1976
  12. Meachum Vs. Fano US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1976
  13. Meyer Vs. Nebraska US Supreme Court · Jun 04, 1923
  14. Mathews Vs. Eldridge US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1976
  15. Poe Vs. Ullman US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  16. Goss Vs. Lopez US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1975
  17. Mahler Vs. Eby US Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1924
  18. U.S. 651 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Ingraham v. Wright
    Search
  19. U.S. 651 (1977) Ingraham v. Wright
    Search
  20. authority, but also by legislatures engaged in making the laws by which judicial authority would be measured. Weems v. United
    Search
  21. Page 430 U. S. 666 Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  22. Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments has dealt with a criminal punishment. Page 430 U. S. 667 See Estelle v. Gamble
    Search
  23. Robinson v. California
    Search
  24. Weems v. United
    Search
  25. Pervear v. Commonwealth
    Search
  26. first, it limits the kinds of punishment that can be imposed on those convicted of crimes, e.g., Estelle v. Gamble
    Search
  27. second, it proscribes punishment grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime, e.g., Weems v. United
    Search
  28. and third, it imposes substantive limits on what can be made criminal and punished as such, e.g., Robinson v. California
    Search
  29. no difficulty Page 430 U. S. 668 finding the Eighth Amendment inapplicable. Thus, in Fong Yue Ting v. United
    Search
  30. Mahler v. Eby
    Search
  31. U. S. 685 (1913). And in Uphaus v. Wyman
    Search
  32. Id. at 360 U. S. 81 , quoting Green v. United
    Search
  33. the same beatings at the hands of their jailers might have a valid claim under the Eighth Amendment. See Jackson v. Bishop
    Search
  34. Estelle v. Gamble
    Search
  35. Meachum v. Fano
    Search
  36. U.S. at 429 U. S. 103 , quoting Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  37. Board of Regents v. Roth
    Search
  38. Dent v. West
    Search
  39. thought to encompass Page 430 U. S. 674 freedom from bodily restraint and punishment. See Rochin v. California
    Search
  40. Anti-Fascist Comm. v. McGrath
    Search
  41. U. S. 319 , 424 U. S. 335 (1976). Cf. Arnett v. Kennedy
    Search
  42. U.S. Supreme Court Ingraham v. Wright
    Search
  43. See Estelle v. Gamble
    Search
  44. Francis v. Resweber
    Search
  45. Fong Yue Ting v. United
    Search
  46. Green v. United
    Search
  47. the Eighth Amendment. See Jackson v. Bishop
    Search
  48. Dent v. West
    Search
  49. See Rochin v. California
    Search
  50. Cf. Arnett v. Kennedy
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial