Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wooley Vs. Maynard

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 20, 1977

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

48 entries 5 linked 43 unlinked
Show
  1. Steffel Vs. Thompson US Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1974
  2. Shelton Vs. Tucker US Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1960
  3. Spence Vs. Washington US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1974
  4. Samuels Vs. Mackell US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1971
  5. New York Times Co. Vs. Sullivan US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1964
  6. U.S. 705 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Wooley v. Maynard
    Search
  7. U.S. 705 (1977) Wooley v. Maynard
    Search
  8. The principles of equitable restraint enunciated in Younger v. Harris
    Search
  9. rights, failure to seek state appellate review of criminal convictions does not bar relief in federal court. Huffman v. Pursue
    Search
  10. Board of Education v. Barnette
    Search
  11. in this section has been interpreted by the State's highest court to include the state motto. State v. Hoskin
    Search
  12. trial judge expressed sympathy for Mr. Maynard's situation, but considered himself bound by the authority of State v. Hoskin
    Search
  13. jurisdiction in this case by the principles of Page 430 U. S. 710 equitable restraint enunciated in Younger v. Harris
    Search
  14. is entitled to resort to a federal forum to seek redress for an alleged deprivation of federal rights. See Steffel v. Thompson
    Search
  15. Doran v. Salem
    Search
  16. for an alleged deprivation of federal rights. Huffman v. Pursue
    Search
  17. Appellants, however, point out that Maynard failed to seek review of his criminal convictions, and cite Huffman v. Pursue
    Search
  18. Inn, supra at 422 U. S. 931 , quoting Samuels v. Mackell
    Search
  19. Spielman Motor Co. v. Dodge
    Search
  20. the ordinary tasks of daily life which require an automobile, is sufficient to justify injunctive relief. Cf. Douglas v. City
    Search
  21. action includes both the right to speak freely and the right to refrain from speaking at all. See Board of Education v. Barnette
    Search
  22. Id. at 319 U. S. 637 . This is illustrated by the recent case of Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
    Search
  23. enforced right of access inescapably 'dampens the vigor and limits the variety of public debate,' New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  24. the flag both with words and traditional salute gestures. In overruling its prior decision in Minersville District v. Gobitis
    Search
  25. compelling to justify requiring appellees to display the state motto on their license plates. See, e.g., United States v. O'Brien
    Search
  26. JUSTICE WHITE, with whom MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN and MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST join in part, dissenting in part. Steffel v. Thompson
    Search
  27. judgment may be entered with respect to the state statute at issue without regard to the strictures of Younger v. Harris
    Search
  28. open whether an injunction should also issue in such circumstances. 415 U.S. at 415 U. S. 463 . Then Doran v. Salem
    Search
  29. Ibid. Doran was thus true to the teachings of Douglas v. City
    Search
  30. citing the same authorities to this effect that this Court relied on in Younger v. Harris
    Search
  31. U. S. 95 (1935). The Court has plainly departed from the teaching of these cases. The whole point of Douglas v. City
    Search
  32. analogous case, a decision of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire had reached precisely the opposite result. See State v. Noskin
    Search
  33. for identification and registration purposes. In Part 4-A, the Court relies almost solely on Board of Education v. Barnette
    Search
  34. U.S. Supreme Court Wooley v. Maynard
    Search
  35. Younger v. Harris
    Search
  36. Huffman v. Pursue
    Search
  37. State v. Hoskin
    Search
  38. of State v. Hoskin
    Search
  39. See Steffel v. Thompson
    Search
  40. Cf. Douglas v. City
    Search
  41. See Board of Education v. Barnette
    Search
  42. of Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
    Search
  43. Minersville District v. Gobitis
    Search
  44. of Younger v. Harris
    Search
  45. Then Doran v. Salem
    Search
  46. of Douglas v. City
    Search
  47. See State v. Noskin
    Search
  48. United States v. O'Brien
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial