Citation network
Trimble Vs. Gordon
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 26, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 762 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Trimble v. GordonSearch
-
U.S. 762 (1977) Trimble v. GordonSearch
-
Weber v. AetnaSearch
-
the equal protection challenge to the discrimination against illegitimate children on the explicit authority of Labine v. VincentSearch
-
We considered and rejected a similar argument last Term in Mathews v. LucasSearch
-
Gomez, supra at 409 U. S. 538 . Our decision last Term in Mathews v. LucasSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The reach of the statute extends well Page 430 U. S. 773 beyond the asserted purposes. See Jimenez v. WeinbergerSearch
-
at 52, 329 N.E.2d at 240. The penultimate paragraph of the opinion in Labine distinguishes that case from Levy v. LouisianaSearch
-
of the facts. If Sherman Gordon had devised his estate to Deta Mona, this case would not be here. Similarly, in Reed v. ReedSearch
-
of decedents in the allocation of estates among the Page 430 U. S. 776 categories of heirs. See Mathews v. LucasSearch
-
Page 430 U. S. 777 Supreme Court of Illinois, they find this case constitutionally indistinguishable from Labine v. VincentSearch
-
Beaty v. WeinbergerSearch
-
Griffin v. RichardsonSearch
-
Davis v. RichardsonSearch
-
Glona v. AmericanSearch
-
See cases cited n 11, supra. Labine v. VincentSearch
-
of this Court's equal protection decisions, and subsequent cases have limited its force as a precedent. In Weber v. AetnaSearch
-
U.S. at 406 U. S. 170 , quoting Labine v. VincentSearch
-
is a point beyond which such deference cannot justify discrimination. Although the proposition is self-evident, Reed v. ReedSearch
-
involving the disposition of property at death are not immunized from equal protection scrutiny. See also Eskra v. MortonSearch
-
See Eskra v. MortonSearch
-
Civil War legislation, sharply altered the balance of power between the Federal and State Governments. See Mitchum v. FosterSearch
-
is responsible to no constituency, and which is held back only by its own sense of self-restraint, see United States v. ButlerSearch
-
the freeing of the slaves, the core prohibition was early held to be aimed at the protection of blacks. See Strauder v. WestSearch
-
concerned, it followed logically that it should not be valid where other races were concerned, either. See Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
next step was the extension of the protection to prohibit classifications resting on national origin. See Oyama v. CaliforniaSearch
-
involving race or national origin, they are enough like the latter to warrant similar treatment. See Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause than will other laws regulating economic and social conditions. Levy v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 628 (1974). But see Mathews v. LucasSearch
-
Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
not be the last, to import this sort of analysis into the Equal Protection Clause. As long ago as Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Trimble v. GordonSearch
-
of Labine v. VincentSearch
-
See Jimenez v. WeinbergerSearch
-
See Mathews v. LucasSearch
-
In Weber v. AetnaSearch
-
Eskra v. MortonSearch
-
the Federal and State Governments. See Mitchum v. FosterSearch
-
See Strauder v. WestSearch
-
See Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
See Oyama v. CaliforniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial