Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Wong

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 23, 1977

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

24 entries 3 linked 21 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Mandujano US Supreme Court · May 19, 1976
  2. United States Vs. Dionisio US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1973
  3. Counselman Vs. Hitchcock US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1892
  4. U.S. 174 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Wong
    Search
  5. U.S. 174 (1977) United States v. Wong
    Search
  6. of being forced to choose between incriminatory truth and falsehood, as opposed to a refusal to answer. United States v. Knox
    Search
  7. Bryson v. United
    Search
  8. Id. at 579. Following our decision in United States v. Mandujano
    Search
  9. Glickstein v. United
    Search
  10. the availability of the privilege, and thus eliminate the claimed dilemma of self-incrimination or perjury. Cf. Garner v. United
    Search
  11. States, 424 U. S. 648 , 424 U. S. 657 -658 (1976). However, in United States v. Knox
    Search
  12. Footnote omitted.) Bryson v. United
    Search
  13. compel an answer to its incriminating questions, a citizen is not at liberty to answer falsely. United States v. Knox
    Search
  14. In United States v. Mandujano
    Search
  15. Knox filed the false return prior to this Court's decisions in Marchetti v. United
    Search
  16. States, 390 U. S. 39 (1968), and Grosso v. United
    Search
  17. Cf. United States v. Mandujano
    Search
  18. is no constitutional prohibition against summoning potential defendants to testify before a grand jury. United States v. Dionisio
    Search
  19. in judgment). The historic availability of the Fifth Amendment privilege in grand jury proceedings, Counselman v. Hitchcock
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Wong
    Search
  21. Cf. Garner v. United
    Search
  22. Marchetti v. United
    Search
  23. and Grosso v. United
    Search
  24. United States v. Knox
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales