Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Trainor Vs. Hernandez

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 31, 1977

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

61 entries 11 linked 50 unlinked
Show
  1. Younger Vs. Harris US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1971
  2. Gibson Vs. Berryhill US Supreme Court · May 07, 1973
  3. Kugler Vs. Helfant US Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1975
  4. Watson Vs. Buck US Supreme Court · May 26, 1941
  5. Hawks Vs. Hamill US Supreme Court · Jan 09, 1933
  6. Matthews Vs. Rodgers US Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1932
  7. Massachusetts State Grange Vs. Benton US Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1926
  8. Fenner Vs. Boykin US Supreme Court · May 24, 1926
  9. Fuentes Vs. Shevin US Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1972
  10. Juidice Vs. Vail US Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1977
    Relied / Followed
  11. Mitchum Vs. Foster US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1972
  12. U.S. 434 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Trainor v. Hernandez
    Search
  13. U.S. 434 (1977) Trainor v. Hernandez
    Search
  14. inter alia, return of the attached property. Declining to dismiss the complaint under the doctrine of Younger v. Harris
    Search
  15. U. S. 37 , and Huffman v. Pursue
    Search
  16. attachment in state court, it Page 431 U. S. 439 declined to dismiss the case under the doctrine of Younger v. Harris
    Search
  17. U. S. 37 (1971), and Huffman v. Pursue
    Search
  18. Hernandez v. Danaher
    Search
  19. supra, and Samuels v. Mackell
    Search
  20. Beal v. Missouri
    Search
  21. determined by inquiring into the remedies available in the federal, rather than in the state, courts, Great Lakes Co. v. Huffman
    Search
  22. supra at 401 U. S. 45 , quoting Fenner v. Boykin
    Search
  23. to do so. Steffel v. Thompson
    Search
  24. Huffman v. Pursue
    Search
  25. of comity, id. at 420 U. S. 601 , quoting Younger v. Harris
    Search
  26. similar to state civil enforcement actions -- judicial Page 431 U. S. 444 contempt proceedings. Juidice v. Vail
    Search
  27. proceeding, leads us to the conclusion that the interests of comity and federalism on which Younger and Samuels v. Mackell
    Search
  28. U.S. at 401 U. S. 554 , quoting Watson v. Buck
    Search
  29. U. S. 439 ), it would not have been warranted in light of our cases. Compare North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. D-Chem
    Search
  30. See Kugler v. Helfant
    Search
  31. Ibid. I n the companion case of Perez v. Ledesma
    Search
  32. Id. at 401 U. S. 85 . See Mitchum v. Foster
    Search
  33. The policy of equitable restraint expressed in Younger v. Harris
    Search
  34. provides the accused a fair and sufficient opportunity for vindication of federal constitutional rights. See Steffel v. Thompson
    Search
  35. action is an express statutory exception to its application, Mitchum v. Foster
    Search
  36. distinguish between the type of proceedings -- civil or criminal -- pending or contemplated by state officers. Wilson v. Schnettler
    Search
  37. Allegheny County v. Mashuda
    Search
  38. Alabama Public Service Comm'n v. Southern
    Search
  39. Burford v. Sun
    Search
  40. Great Lakes Co. v. Huffman
    Search
  41. Brillhart v. Excess
    Search
  42. Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. Dodge
    Search
  43. Pennsylvania v. Williams
    Search
  44. U. S. 240 , 271 U. S. 243 (1926). As in Juidice v. Vail
    Search
  45. is not a court proceeding within the doctrine of Younger and Huffman. In this regard, they rely on Lynch v. Household
    Search
  46. and Gerstein v. Pugh
    Search
  47. of the State's interest in its proceeding has been an important factor in abstention cases under Younger v. Harris
    Search
  48. itself, the Court relied on the State's vital concern in the administration of its criminal laws. In Huffman v. Pursue
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court Trainor v. Hernandez
    Search
  50. of Younger v. Harris
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial