Citation network
Teamsters Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 31, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 431 U.S. 324 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977) Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
relief for post-Act discriminatees even if the seniority system agreement makes no provision for such relief. Franks v. BowmanSearch
-
the Government bore the initial burden of making out a prima facie case of discrimination. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
in cases in which the existence of discrimination is a disputed issue. Mayor of Philadelphia v. EducationalSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Equality League, 415 U. S. 605 , 415 U. S. 620 . See also McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
U.S. at 411 U. S. 805 . Cf. Washington v. DavisSearch
-
this case, to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination in jury selection cases, see, e.g., Turner v. FoucheSearch
-
be rebutted. In short, their usefulness depends on all of the surrounding facts and circumstances. See, e.g., Hester v. SouthernSearch
-
illegal conduct or its obligation to afford relief to those who suffered because of it. Cf. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodSearch
-
for this Court to disturb the findings of the District Court and the Court of Appeals on this basic issue. See Blau v. LehmanSearch
-
United States v. CommercialSearch
-
United States v. ChemicalSearch
-
h) in Franks v. BowmanSearch
-
relief, including retroactive seniority under Franks v. BowmanSearch
-
Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
Alexander v. Gardner-DenverSearch
-
Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
their face and in intent but that nonetheless discriminate in effect against a particular group. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSearch
-
Washington v. DavisSearch
-
Ibid., quoting Phelps Dodge Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
case must be equivalent to that outlined in McDonnell Douglas v. GreenSearch
-
In Franks v. BowmanSearch
-
of a district court's remedial powers under Title VII is determined by the purposes of the Act. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
U.S. at 422 U. S. 417 . In Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
award of relief to a person claiming that he was denied employment because of union affiliation or activity. In NLRB v. NevadaSearch
-
workers despite the failure of individual strikers to apply for reinstatement when the strike ended. E.g., NLRB v. ParkSearch
-
NLRB v. ValleySearch
-
Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co. v. NLRBSearch
-
F.2d 03 (CA8). See also Piasecki Aircraft Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
NLRB v. AnchorSearch
-
NLRB v. LummusSearch
-
a useless act serving only to confirm a discriminatee's knowledge that the job he wanted was unavailable to him. Acha v. BeameSearch
-
Hairston v. McLeanSearch
-
Bing v. RoadwaySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
Franks v. BowmanSearch
-
Mayor of Philadelphia v. EducationalSearch
-
Cf. Washington v. DavisSearch
-
Hester v. SouthernSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial