Citation network
United States Vs. Ramsey
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 06, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 606 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. RamseySearch
-
U.S. 606 (1977) United States v. RamseySearch
-
imposed by the Fourth Amendment as a requirement for the issuance of warrants. See United States v. KingSearch
-
Terry v. OhioSearch
-
we are left simply with the question of whether the search, nevertheless violated the Constitution. Cf. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
which proposed the Fourth Amendment is, we think, manifest. This Court so concluded almost a century ago. In Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
within the meaning of that Amendment, has been faithfully adhered to by this Court. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Emphasis supplied.) More recently, we noted this longstanding history in United States v. Thirty-sevenSearch
-
Finally, citing Carroll and Boyd, this Court stated in Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
of Berne, 19 Stat. 604, which prohibited the importation of letters which might contain dutiable items. Cotzhausen v. NazroSearch
-
The contrary view of the Court of Appeals and respondents stems, we think, from an erroneous reading of Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
exception treated in United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
U. S. 218 , 414 U. S. 224 (1973). We think that the language in Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
clear. The Carroll Court Page 431 U. S. 622 quoted verbatim the above-quoted language from Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
to take an expansive view of the border search exception or the authority of the Boarder Patrol. See United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. Martnez-FuerteSearch
-
United States v. BiswellSearch
-
class mail may be opened, pursuant to a border search, without probable cause and without a warrant. United States v. MilroySearch
-
United States v. KingSearch
-
United States v. BarcliftSearch
-
United States v. BolinSearch
-
United States v. OdlandSearch
-
indicated that the opening of international letter-class mail should be governed by the same standards. United States v. DoeSearch
-
F.2d 982 (CA2), cert. denied sub nom. Rodriguez v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BeckleySearch
-
F.2d 86 (CA6 1964), cert. denied sub nom. Stone v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 380 U.S. 922 (1965). The First Circuit has reserved the question of letters. United States v. EmerySearch
-
to them. The Government, however, did not raise the issue below, and consequently we do not reach it. United States v. SantanaSearch
-
the statute has long since been interpreted otherwise. Cotzhausen v. NazroSearch
-
the question, recently addressed in other contexts, of the geographical limits to border searches. See United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
subjects such mail to customs inspection at a place other than the point of entry into this country. See United States v. KingSearch
-
because of the particularly offensive manner in which it is carried out. Cf. Kremen v. UnitedSearch
-
Go-Bart Importing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
The opinion in Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
d). See also United States v. KingSearch
-
were, whether the appropriate response would be to apply the full panoply of Fourth Amendment requirements. Cf. Roaden v. KentuckySearch
-
U. S. 476 , 379 U. S. 485 (1965). In Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
NLRB v. BellSearch
-
adequate for over a century, then these matters should be brought to the attention of Congress. Cf. H. K. Porter Co. v. NLRBSearch
-
U. S. 420 , 363 U. S. 430 . Cf. Ashwander v. TennesseeSearch
-
This was the procedure followed by the customs officials in Cotzhausen v. NazroSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial