Citation network
Splawn Vs. California
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 06, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 595 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Splawn v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. 595 (1977) Splawn v. CaliforniaSearch
-
to convict him even though it might otherwise have found that the film was protected under the standards of Miller v. CaliforniaSearch
-
and (2) violated the prohibition against ex post facto laws, and the fair warning requirement of Bouie v. ColumbiaSearch
-
Ginzburg v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 383 U. S. 463 , 383 U. S. 470 . See also Hamling v. UnitedSearch
-
People v. NoroffSearch
-
this Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded for consideration in light of our decision in Miller v. CaliforniaSearch
-
After the State Supreme Court ruled that the statute satisfied the requirements articulated in Miller, see Bloom v. MunicipalSearch
-
post facto laws and the requirement of fair warning in the construction of a criminal statute enunciated in Bouie v. CitySearch
-
creation, promotion, or dissemination of material is relevant in determining whether the material is obscene. Hamling v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
is our power to upset state court convictions by reason of instructions given during the course of a trial. See Cupp v. NaughtenSearch
-
his conviction both violates the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws, See Calder v. BullSearch
-
and failed to give him constitutionally fair warning of the prohibited conduct with which he was charged. Bouie v. ColumbiaSearch
-
ex post facto argument is based on his reading of an earlier decision of the Supreme Court of California, People v. NoroffSearch
-
would have had a tenable claim under the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. Bouie v. CitySearch
-
Amendment protection of nonobscene matter, the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws, or Bouie v. CitySearch
-
MARSHALL join, dissenting. The California courts, in response to our remand for reconsideration in light of Miller v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. at 413 U. S. 47 (BRENNAN, J., dissenting). See also Pendleton v. CaliforniaSearch
-
by the First Amendment even though Page 431 U. S. 603 made for a commercial purpose. Virginia Pharmacy Bd v. VirginiaSearch
-
U.S. at 425 U. S. 770 . See also Linmark Associates, Inc. v. WillingboroSearch
-
Miller v. CaliforniaSearch
-
I must also record my dissent from the Court's disposition of petitioner's ex post facto argument. In People v. NoroffSearch
-
El Paso v. SimmonsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Splawn v. CaliforniaSearch
-
of Miller v. CaliforniaSearch
-
of Bouie v. ColumbiaSearch
-
Hamling v. UnitedSearch
-
Bloom v. MunicipalSearch
-
Bouie v. CitySearch
-
See Cupp v. NaughtenSearch
-
See Calder v. BullSearch
-
Bouie v. ColumbiaSearch
-
of the Supreme Court of California, People v. NoroffSearch
-
the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. Bouie v. CitySearch
-
Pendleton v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Virginia Pharmacy Bd v. VirginiaSearch
-
Linmark Associates, Inc. v. WillingboroSearch
-
In People v. NoroffSearch
-
Kaplan v. CaliforniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial