Citation network
Mandel Vs. Bradley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 16, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 173 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Mandel v. BradleySearch
-
U.S. 173 (1977) Mandel v. BradleySearch
-
the three-judge District Court was not warranted in holding, on the basis of this Court's summary affirmance in Tucker v. SaleraSearch
-
should have conducted an independent examination of the merits under the constitutional standards set forth in Storer v. BrownSearch
-
The court based its holding on our summary affirmance in Tucker v. SaleraSearch
-
the three-judge court relied, not on the short period for signature gathering (which it thought was valid under Storer v. BrownSearch
-
case ad thus required the District Court to conclude that the early filing date is impermissibly burdensome. Hicks v. MirandaSearch
-
Footnote omitted.) Fusari v. SteinbergSearch
-
Court failed to undertake an independent examination of the merits. The appropriate inquiry was set out in Storer v. BrownSearch
-
number of signatures, obtained a place on the ballot, ran, and lost. This case is nonetheless not moot. Storer v. BrownSearch
-
In Storer v. BrownSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the statutory scheme. 415 U.S. at 415 U. S. 742 -743. The District Court in this case erred in reading Storer v. BrownSearch
-
I join the opinion of the Court, but write to emphasize the Court's treatment of the rule announced in Hicks v. MirandaSearch
-
U. S. 332 (1975). In a dissent from the denial of certiorari in Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd. v. RizzoSearch
-
U.S. at 913. The Court, by not relying on our summary affirmance in Tucker v. SaleraSearch
-
U.S. 959 (1976), and Auerbach v. MandelSearch
-
concurring. Although there are many indications in the District Court's opinion that it not only considered Tucker v. SaleraSearch
-
In Jenness v. FortsonSearch
-
in Jenness, see id. at 403 U. S. 434 . Thus, that decision is not controlling on this point, KVOS, Inc. v. AssociatedSearch
-
Press, 299 U. S. 269 , 299 U. S. 279 , quoting Webster v. FallSearch
-
For the reasons stated in Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
U. S. 651 , 415 U. S. 670 -671, I do not regard the summary affirmance in Auerbach v. MandelSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Mandel v. BradleySearch
-
Tucker v. SaleraSearch
-
Storer v. BrownSearch
-
and Auerbach v. MandelSearch
-
KVOS, Inc. v. AssociatedSearch
-
Auerbach v. MandelSearch
-
Edelman v. JordanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial