Citation network
Brown Vs. Ohio
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 16, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 161 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. 161 (1977) Brown v. OhioSearch
-
Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
it was designed originally to embody the protection of the common law pleas of former jeopardy, see United States v. WilsonSearch
-
court does not exceed its legislative authorization by imposing multiple punishments for the same offense. See Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
Bell v. UnitedSearch
-
That policy protects the accused from attempts to relitigate the facts underlying a prior acquittal, See Ashe v. SwensonSearch
-
United States v. MartinSearch
-
S. 564 (1977), and from attempts to secure additional punishment after a prior conviction and sentence, see Green v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
offenses are sufficiently distinguishable to permit the imposition of cumulative punishment was stated in Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
Iannelli v. UnitedSearch
-
Gavieres v. UnitedSearch
-
Morey v. CommonwealthSearch
-
each requires proof that the other does not. Id. at 131 U. S. 188 , 131 U. S. 190 , citing Morey v. CommonwealthSearch
-
application of the same rule, the Court cited, 131 U.S. at 131 U. S. 190 , with approval the decision of State v. CooperSearch
-
by the simple expedient of dividing a single crime into a series of temporal or spatial units. Cf. Braverman v. UnitedSearch
-
Cuyahoga County prosecutions must be viewed as the acts of a single sovereign under the Double Jeopardy Clause. Waller v. FloridaSearch
-
jeopardy questions that may arise when a defendant is retried on the same charge after a mistrial, e.g., United States v. JornSearch
-
U. S. 470 (1971), or dismissal of the indictment or information, e.g., United States v. JenkinsSearch
-
U. S. 358 (1975), or after a conviction is reversed on appeal, e.g., United States v. BallSearch
-
separate prosecutions on closely related criminal charges when the accused opposes a consolidated trial, e.g., Jeffers v. UnitedSearch
-
where the second prosecution requires the relitigation of factual issues already resolved by the first. Thus in Ashe v. SwensonSearch
-
robbery of each victim would have required proof in each case that a different individual had been robbed. See Ebeling v. MorganSearch
-
Ashe, supra at 397 U. S. 446 , quoting from Green v. UnitedSearch
-
to sustain that charge have not occurred or have not been discovered despite the exercise of due diligence. See Diaz v. UnitedSearch
-
is a separate offense for each day in which a motor vehicle is operated without the owner's consent. Cf. Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
as to violate due process. See Bouie v. CitySearch
-
Crepps v. DurdenSearch
-
U. S. 436 , 397 U. S. 453 -454, and n. 7 (1970) (BRENNAN, J., concurring). See Thompson v. OklahomaSearch
-
that treatment. I, of course, have no quarrel with the Court's general double jeopardy analysis. See Jeffers v. UnitedSearch
-
of prosecution may be a course of conduct rather than the separate segments of such a course. See, e.g., United States v. UniversalSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. OhioSearch
-
United States v. WilsonSearch
-
See Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
See Ashe v. SwensonSearch
-
United States v. MartinSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
-
Gavieres v. UnitedSearch
-
of State v. CooperSearch
-
Cf. Braverman v. UnitedSearch
-
the Double Jeopardy Clause. Waller v. FloridaSearch
-
Jeffers v. UnitedSearch
-
See Ebeling v. MorganSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial