Citation network
Morris Vs. Gressette
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 491 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Morris v. GressetteSearch
-
U.S. 491 (1977) Morris v. GressetteSearch
-
jurisdiction and allowed South Carolina 30 days to enact an acceptable substitute reapportionment plan. Twiggs v. WestSearch
-
in Twiggs v. WestSearch
-
Harper v. KleindienstSearch
-
to interpose an objection on the ground that he was constrained to defer to the ruling of the District Court in Twiggs v. WestSearch
-
of Columbia District Court directed the Attorney General to consider Act 1205 without regard to the decision in Twiggs v. WestSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
issues. Harper v. LeviSearch
-
of the Voting Rights Act. See Allen v. StateSearch
-
estoppel did not preclude it from considering South Carolina's contention that, notwithstanding the decision in Harper v. LeviSearch
-
of the Attorney General's initial determination to defer to the ruling of the three-judge District Court in Twiggs v. WestSearch
-
of the reapportionment plan. Since that objection was interposed pursuant to the District Court's order in Harper v. KleindienstSearch
-
U.S. at 397 U. S. 166 . See Association of Data Processing Service Orgs. v. CampSearch
-
Switchmen v. NationalSearch
-
procedure, Allen v. StateSearch
-
legislation conforms to the Constitution and to the provisions of the Voting Rights Act. See South Carolina v. KatzenbachSearch
-
Allen v. StateSearch
-
of the extraordinary federal remedy beyond the period specified in the statute. Switchmen v. NationalSearch
-
of the newly enacted legislation or voting regulation. Cf. Dunlop v. BachowskiSearch
-
inadequacy of private suits under the Fifteenth Amendment that prompted Congress to pass the Voting Rights Act. Allen v. StateSearch
-
to run for a single, numbered post, and specified that primary elections be decided by a majority vote. See Harper v. LeviSearch
-
The constitutionality of this procedure was upheld in South Carolina v. KatzenbachSearch
-
It has been held applicable when a State or political subdivision adopts a legislative reapportionment plan. Beer v. UnitedSearch
-
Georgia v. UnitedSearch
-
See South Carolina v. KatzenbachSearch
-
City of Richmond v. UnitedSearch
-
Beer v. UnitedSearch
-
statutory period, since the submission on Act 932 was not considered to be complete until January 5, 1972. See Georgia v. UnitedSearch
-
provisions of Act 932 calling for multimember districts, numbered posts, and a majority vote in primaries. See Harper v. LeviSearch
-
This Court summarily affirmed the decision of the District Court. Powell v. WestSearch
-
This Court held in Connor v. WallerSearch
-
for which preclearance is not required. East Carroll Parish School Bd. v. MarshallSearch
-
in the State. See Harper v. LeviSearch
-
numbered posts for the State's House of Representatives. See n 6, supra. The District Court in Twiggs v. WestSearch
-
East Carroll Parish School Bd. v. MarshallSearch
-
it is unnecessary for this Court to reach the issue of reviewability, since the single-judge District Court in Harper v. KleindienstSearch
-
the time until the Attorney General acted or until further order of the District Court. Relying on United States v. MineSearch
-
of Act 1205. Here, the validity of the District Court's interlocutory order in Harper v. KleindienstSearch
-
Accord, Dunlop v. BachowskiSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Morris v. GressetteSearch
-
Twiggs v. WestSearch
-
Harper v. LeviSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial