Citation network
Maher Vs. Roe
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 464 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Maher v. RoeSearch
-
U.S. 464 (1977) Maher v. RoeSearch
-
that generally subsidizes the medical expenses incident to pregnancy and childbirth. The court found implicit in Roe v. WadeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 113 , and Doe v. BoltonSearch
-
need alone does not identify a suspect class for purposes of equal protection analysis. See San Antonio School Dist. v. RodriguezSearch
-
Page 432 U. S. 465 Beal v. DoeSearch
-
joined, ante, p. 432 U. S. 462 . MR. JUSTICE POWELL delivered the opinion of the Court. In Beal v. DoeSearch
-
that the Social Security Act not only allowed state funding of nontherapeutic abortions, but also required it. Roe v. NortonSearch
-
U. S. 113 (1973), and Doe v. BoltonSearch
-
F.Supp. at 663 n. 3. Relying also on Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
U. S. 618 (1969), and Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
San Antonio School Dist. v. RodriguezSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 411 U. S. 17 (1973). Accord, Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement v. MurgiaSearch
-
The District Court read our decisions in Roe v. WadeSearch
-
in form but similar in effect, on the woman's freedom of choice. Thus, in Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSearch
-
Emphasis added.) Although a state-created obstacle need not be absolute to be impermissible, see Doe v. BoltonSearch
-
Carey v. PopulationSearch
-
free from governmental compulsion. Whalen v. RoeSearch
-
U. S. 589 , 429 U. S. 599 -600, and nn. 24 and 26 (1977). As Whalen makes clear, the right in Roe v. WadeSearch
-
in two cases cited in Roe in support of the pregnant woman's right under the Fourteenth Amendment. Meyer v. NebraskaSearch
-
U.S. at 262 U. S. 400 . In Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
to favor public education by funding it -- a policy choice pursued in some States for more than a century. See Brown v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 347 U. S. 483 , 347 U. S. 489 n. 4 (1954). Indeed, in Norwood v. HarrisonSearch
-
purpose. Lindsey v. NormetSearch
-
In Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
Optical Co., 348 U. S. 483 , 348 U. S. 488 (1955), quoted in Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. MaySearch
-
abortions as a condition of state participation in the Medicaid program. Also, under Title XIX as construed in Beal v. DoeSearch
-
such procedures do not involve the termination of a potential human life. In Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSearch
-
from the Court of Appeals, the District Court issued temporary restraining orders covering three additional women. Roe v. NortonSearch
-
pregnancies through abortion, the present case is easily distinguished from Boddie. See also United States v. KrasSearch
-
In cases such as Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 12 (1956), and Douglas v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Skinner v. OklahomaSearch
-
Appellees rely on Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
the view that Connecticut must show a compelling interest for its decision not to fund elective abortions. Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
In Buckley v. ValeoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial