Citation network
Batterton Vs. Francis
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 416 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Batterton v. FrancisSearch
-
U.S. 416 (1977) Batterton v. FrancisSearch
-
thus eliminating the practice of removing needy children in situations of that kind to institutions. See Burns v. AlcalaSearch
-
it was contemplated that other programs would alleviate that problem by attacking unemployment directly. See Carleson v. RemillardSearch
-
King v. SmithSearch
-
incentives, but the federal role in these programs is not so great as in AFDC. See Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySearch
-
a). See Philbrook v. GlodgettSearch
-
and HEW supervision. Funding is provided from state and federal revenues on a matching basis. See, e.g., Shea v. VialpandoSearch
-
the federal regulation prescribing standards for the determination of unemployment under the AFDC-UF program. Francis v. DavidsonSearch
-
the injunction on the ground that the amended federal regulation now was in conflict with the federal statute. Francis v. DavidsonSearch
-
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. There the case was consolidated with an appeal in a similar case, Bethea v. MasonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
in Title II of the Social Security Act included a backpay award. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSearch
-
simply because it would have interpreted the statute in a different manner. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
a), is within the statutory authority delegated to the Secretary, and is reasonable. v. TheSearch
-
a). Philbrook v. GlodgettSearch
-
was permitted to adopt a somewhat more liberal hours-worked test than the minimum required by the Secretary. Macias v. FinchSearch
-
legitimate local Page 432 U. S. 432 policies in determining eligibility. See New York Dept. of Soc. Services v. DublinoSearch
-
Stat. 273. In Philbrook v. GlodgettSearch
-
result in disqualification for unemployment compensation under the State's unemployment compensation law. In Davidson v. FrancisSearch
-
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Attorney General's Manual on the Administrative Procedure Act 30 n. 3 (1947). See United States v. MerskySearch
-
Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. ScarlettSearch
-
as the timing and consistency of the agency's position, and the nature of its expertise. See General Electric Co. v. GilbertSearch
-
Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
E), (F), was available in this case. See Camp v. PittsSearch
-
Dept. of HEW, Social Security Programs in the United States 54 (1971). See also Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySearch
-
unemployed father have a substantial connection with the workforce and that he actively seek employment. See Philbrook v. GlodgettSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Batterton v. FrancisSearch
-
See Burns v. AlcalaSearch
-
See Carleson v. RemillardSearch
-
AFDC. See Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySearch
-
See Philbrook v. GlodgettSearch
-
Francis v. DavidsonSearch
-
Bethea v. MasonSearch
-
Social Security Board v. NierotkoSearch
-
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the Secretary. Macias v. FinchSearch
-
See New York Dept. of Soc. Services v. DublinoSearch
-
In Philbrook v. GlodgettSearch
-
In Davidson v. FrancisSearch
-
See United States v. MerskySearch
-
See General Electric Co. v. GilbertSearch
-
See Camp v. PittsSearch
-
Preserve Overton Park v. VolpeSearch
-
Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial