Citation network
United States Vs. Chadwick
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 21, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 1 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1977) United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
of Chambers v. MaroneySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
to the home, searches conducted pursuant to them often were carried out in private residences. See generally Stanford v. TexasSearch
-
Marcus v. SearchSearch
-
in safeguarding against unreasonable searches and seizures. See United States v. RabinowitzSearch
-
Fourth Amendment issues is whether or not a search or seizure is reasonable under all the circumstances. Cooper v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
of the lawful authority of the executing officer, his need to search, and the limits of his power to search. Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Ex parte Jackson, 96 U. S. 727 , 96 U. S. 733 (1878). We reaffirmed Jackson in United States v. VanSearch
-
contained only coins. Judicial warrants have been required for other searches conducted outside the home. E.g., Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
Preston v. UnitedSearch
-
G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
and not simply those interests found inside the four walls of the home. Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
of automobiles in circumstances in which warrantless searches would not be reasonable in other contexts. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 42 (1970). See also South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
official inspection, and they are often taken into police custody in the interests of public safety. South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
U.S. at 395 U. S. 763 . See also Terry v. OhioSearch
-
arresting officer to calculate the probability that weapons or destructible evidence may be involved. United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
This has been settled law in this Court for over 90 years. At least since Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
This is not to say that the Fourth Amendment translates precisely into a constitutional privacy right. See Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
be the case when automobiles are seized. Absolutely secure storage facilities may not be available, see South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
to transport it to the station house without opening the luggage and disarming the weapon. See, e.g., United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
Unlike searches of the person, United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
the clothing and effects of one placed in custodial arrest. The rationale for this was explained in United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
Id. at 414 U. S. 235 . Accord, Gustafson v. FloridaSearch
-
the arrest, and indeed may be delayed a number of hours while the suspect remains in lawful custody. United States v. EdwardsSearch
-
and, with probable cause, its contents (including locked compartments) subsequently examined without a warrant. Texas v. WhiteSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
Stanford v. TexasSearch
-
See United States v. RabinowitzSearch
-
Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
United States v. VanSearch
-
E.g., Katz v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial