Citation network
Rinaldi Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 07, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Rinaldi v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 434 U.S. 22 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Rinaldi v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 434 U.S. 22 (1977) Rinaldi v. UnitedSearch
-
Government's policy against multiple prosecutions for the same act (the so-called Petite policy based on Petite v. UnitedSearch
-
been obtained in violation of a longstanding federal policy against multiple prosecutions for the same act. See Petite v. UnitedSearch
-
represents the Government's response to repeated expressions of concern by Members of this Court. In United States v. LanzaSearch
-
S. 377 , 260 U. S. 383 (1922), for example, Mr. Chief Justice Taft quoted the following passage from Fox v. OhioSearch
-
Petite policy was formulated by the Justice Department in direct response to this Court's opinions in Bartkus v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 121 (1959), and Abbate v. UnitedSearch
-
with the greater interest is not the first to proceed, the administration of criminal justice may suffer. Bartkus v. IllinoisSearch
-
Abbate v. UnitedSearch
-
leave if the Government's decision to terminate this prosecution clearly disserved the public interest. United States v. CowanSearch
-
to commit grand larceny was reversed on appeal. His convictions on the other two counts were affirmed. See Scaldeferri v. StateSearch
-
So.2d 407 (Fla.App.), cert. denied sub nom. Pompeo v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
So.2d 21 (Fla.), cert. denied sub nom. Washington v. FloridaSearch
-
we have granted the Government's motion on several occasions. See Watts v. UnitedSearch
-
Ackerson v. UnitedSearch
-
Hayles v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Redmond v. UnitedSearch
-
Marakar v. UnitedSearch
-
Petite v. UnitedSearch
-
when the Government moves to dismiss an indictment over the defendant's objection. See, e.g., United States v. CoxSearch
-
F.2d 167, 171 (CA5), cert. denied sub nom. Cox v. HaubergSearch
-
Woodring v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 311 F.2d 417, 424 (CA), cert. denied sub nom. Felice v. UnitedSearch
-
has consented if the motion is prompted by considerations clearly contrary to the public interest. See United States v. CowanSearch
-
United States v. AmmidownSearch
-
by the record in this case. MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST, with whom MR. JUSTICE WHITE joins, dissenting. In Watts v. UnitedSearch
-
Solicitor General that the Justice Department had accidentally violated its own Petite policy. See also Ackerson v. UnitedSearch
-
toward an independent judicial assessment of the public interest in dismissing the indictment. Cf. United States v. CowanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Rinaldi v. UnitedSearch
-
See Petite v. UnitedSearch
-
Court. In United States v. LanzaSearch
-
Fox v. OhioSearch
-
and Abbate v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CowanSearch
-
See Scaldeferri v. StateSearch
-
Pompeo v. StateSearch
-
Washington v. FloridaSearch
-
See Watts v. UnitedSearch
-
Cox v. HaubergSearch
-
Felice v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. CowanSearch
-
In Watts v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. United States v. CowanSearch
-
Bartkus v. IllinoisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial