Citation network
Pennsylvania Vs. Mimms
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 05, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 106 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
U.S. 106 (1977) Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
when balanced against legitimate concerns for the officer's safety. 2. Under the standard announced in Terry v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 873 , 422 U. S. 878 (1975). In this case, unlike Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
that traffic violations necessarily involve less danger to officers than other types of confrontations. United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
the answer is controlled by Terry v. OhioSearch
-
against him for all purposes and for all time regardless of this Court's disposition of the matter. See St. Pierre v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 319 U. S. 1 (1943). But cases such as Sibron v. NewSearch
-
Street v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and Ginsberg v. NewSearch
-
opinion, but I write separately to emphasize the extent to which the Court today departs from the teachings of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Id. at 392 U. S. 30 . Such a situation was held to be present in Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
STEVENS, with whom MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL join, dissenting. Almost 10 years ago, in Terry v. OhioSearch
-
in an automobile. Bristow, Police Officer Shootings -- A Tactical Evaluation, 54 J.Crim.L.C. & P.S. 93 (1963).' Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
that the interest in police safety requires the adoption of a standard any more lenient than that permitted by Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Id. at 392 U. S. 19 n. 16. See also Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Cf. State v. OppermanSearch
-
officials may not wander at large in the city, conducting inspections without reason. Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
of Mimms' car would not have warranted a full custodial arrest without some additional justification. See Gustafson v. FloridaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
See St. Pierre v. UnitedSearch
-
Sibron v. NewSearch
-
of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
See Gustafson v. FloridaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial