Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Barrett Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 13, 1976

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 5 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Bass US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1971
  2. Zuber Vs. Allen US Supreme Court · Dec 09, 1969
  3. Apex Hosiery Co. Vs. Leader US Supreme Court · May 27, 1940
    Relied / Followed
  4. United States Vs. Wiltberger US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1820
  5. Automobile Club of Michigan Vs. Commissioner US Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1957
  6. Barrett v. United
    Search
  7. States - 423 U.S. 212 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Barrett v. United
    Search
  8. States, 423 U.S. 212 (1976) Barrett v. United
    Search
  9. conflict with the opinion and decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in United States v. Ruffin
    Search
  10. h), and there is no justification for indulging in uneasy statutory construction. United States v. Wiltberger
    Search
  11. Yates v. United
    Search
  12. Huddleston v. United
    Search
  13. States, 415 U. S. 814 , 415 U. S. 831 (1974). See United States v. Sullivan
    Search
  14. U. S. 696 (1948). There is no occasion here to resort to a rule of lenity, Page 423 U. S. 218 see Rewis v. United
    Search
  15. American Fur Co. v. United
    Search
  16. selling or otherwise disposing of any firearm (whether in an interstate or intrastate transaction, see Huddleston v. United
    Search
  17. a licensee may not knowingly sell a firearm to any prohibited person, even if the sale is intrastate. Huddleston v. United
    Search
  18. Tot v. United
    Search
  19. The second statement is more recent and appears in United States v. Bass
    Search
  20. we would fly in the face of, and ignore, obvious congressional intent at the price of a passing recital. See Girouard v. United
    Search
  21. a)(6). See Huddleston v. United
    Search
  22. in its stance in litigation over the years. It has changed positions before. See, e.g., Automobile Club of Michigan v. Commissioner
    Search
  23. U. S. 185 -186, n. 21 (1969). MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concurring. In meeting petitioner's contention that Tot v. United
    Search
  24. interstate movement, was nonetheless understood to reach only receipts directly involved in interstate commerce. Tot v. United
    Search
  25. In Tot v. United
    Search
  26. unconstitutional in a 1943 case, Tot v. United
    Search
  27. aware of Tot and adopted its interpretation of the statutory language in enacting the present law. See Francis v. Southern
    Search
  28. Commissioner v. Estate
    Search
  29. Just four years ago, in United States v. Bass
    Search
  30. Girouard v. United
    Search
  31. U.S. Supreme Court Barrett v. United
    Search
  32. United States v. Ruffin
    Search
  33. See United States v. Sullivan
    Search
  34. Rewis v. United
    Search
  35. See Girouard v. United
    Search
  36. See Huddleston v. United
    Search
  37. See Francis v. Southern
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial