Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Bornstein

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 14, 1976

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

40 entries 2 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus Vs. Hess US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1943
  2. United States Vs. Mcninch US Supreme Court · May 26, 1958
  3. U.S. 303 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Bornstein
    Search
  4. U.S. 303 (1976) United States v. Bornstein
    Search
  5. who causes a prime contractor to submit a false claim to the Government. See United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess
    Search
  6. In reaching this conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied principally on its earlier decision in United States v. Rohleder
    Search
  7. were involved. The Rohleder court had relied, in turn, on this Court's decision in United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess
    Search
  8. into positive law, the official text of the statute is that which appears in the Revised Statutes. See United States v. Neifert-White
    Search
  9. See United States v. Neifert-White
    Search
  10. number of individual false payment demands that the contractor has made upon the Government. See, e.g., United States v. Woodbury
    Search
  11. Fleming v. United
    Search
  12. United States v. National
    Search
  13. Faulk v. United
    Search
  14. United States v. Grannis
    Search
  15. United States v. Collyer
    Search
  16. Insulated Wire Co., 94 F.Supp. 493, 496-498 (RI). Cf. United States v. Ueber
    Search
  17. U. S. 595 , 356 U. S. 599 , quoting United States v. Tieger
    Search
  18. Cf. United States v. Ueber
    Search
  19. U.S. at 356 U. S. 598 . See also Rainwater v. United
    Search
  20. The only two District Courts that have addressed this question have reached opposing results. Compare United States v. Klein
    Search
  21. aff'd per curiam, 356 F.2d 983 (CA3) (damages doubled after offsetting credits deducted), with United States v. Globe
    Search
  22. p. 137 (1935). See, e.g., United States v. Cooperative
    Search
  23. United States v. Woodbury
    Search
  24. Toepleman v. United
    Search
  25. States, 263 F.2d 697, 700 (CA4), United States v. Ben
    Search
  26. United States v. American
    Search
  27. United States v. Aerodex
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Bornstein
    Search
  29. Marcus v. Hess
    Search
  30. United States v. Rohleder
    Search
  31. the Revised Statutes. See United States v. Neifert-White
    Search
  32. (RI). Cf. United States v. Ueber
    Search
  33. United States v. Tieger
    Search
  34. Rainwater v. United
    Search
  35. Compare United States v. Klein
    Search
  36. United States v. Globe
    Search
  37. United States v. Cooperative
    Search
  38. (CA4), United States v. Ben
    Search
  39. United States v. Aerodex
    Search
  40. United States v. Foster
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales