Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Rizzo Vs. Goode

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 21, 1976

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

73 entries 11 linked 62 unlinked
Show
  1. Baker Vs. Carr US Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1962
  2. Stefanelli Vs. Minard US Supreme Court · Dec 03, 1951
  3. Giles Vs. Harris US Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1903
  4. irwIn Vs. Dixion US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  5. Allee Vs. Medrano US Supreme Court · May 20, 1974
    Relied / Followed
  6. O'Shea Vs. Littleton US Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1974
  7. Cafeteria Workers Vs. Mcelroy US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  8. Sampson Vs. Murray US Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1974
  9. Mitchum Vs. Foster US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1972
  10. United States Vs. Park US Supreme Court · Jun 09, 1975
    Relied / Followed
  11. District of Columbia Vs. Carter US Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1973
  12. U.S. 362 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Rizzo v. Goode
    Search
  13. U.S. 362 (1976) Rizzo v. Goode
    Search
  14. requisite personal stake in the outcome, i.e., the order overhauling police disciplinary procedures. Cf. O'Shea v. Littleton
    Search
  15. as was the active conduct enjoined in Hague v. CIO
    Search
  16. U. S. 496 , and Allee v. Medrano
    Search
  17. b) Nor can the remedy granted here be upheld on the basis that such equitable relief was sanctioned in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
    Search
  18. COPPAR v. Rizzo
    Search
  19. Page 423 U. S. 372 case or controversy between the individually named respondents and petitioners. In O'Shea v. Littleton
    Search
  20. in all -- occurring at large in a city of three million inhabitants, with 7,500 policemen. Nothing in Hague v. CIO
    Search
  21. to continue their unconstitutional policies against the members of this discrete group. Likewise, in Allee v. Medrano
    Search
  22. the theory of liability embodied in the District Court's opinion is supported by desegregation cases such as Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
    Search
  23. case, and the long line of precedents cited therein, simply reaffirmed the body of law originally enunciated in Brown v. Board
    Search
  24. U. S. 117 , 342 U. S. 120 (1951), quoted in O'Shea v. Littleton
    Search
  25. the widest latitude in the 'dispatch of its own internal Page 423 U. S. 379 affairs,' Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy
    Search
  26. quoted in Sampson v. Murray
    Search
  27. must be given to principles of federalism in determining the availability and scope of equitable relief. Doran v. Salem
    Search
  28. as this was, is within those exceptions, Mitchum v. Foster
    Search
  29. militate heavily against the grant of an injunction except in the most extraordinary circumstances. In O'Shea v. Littleton
    Search
  30. principles of federalism may prevent the injunction by a federal court of a state civil proceeding once begun. Huffman v. Pursue
    Search
  31. branch of an agency of state or local governments such as petitioners here. Indeed, in the recent case of Mayor v. Educational
    Search
  32. The complaint in the first action, filed in February, 1970, and styled Goode v. Rizzo
    Search
  33. was brought by respondent Goode and two other individuals. The second, filed in September, 1970, and styled COPPAR v. Tate
    Search
  34. city. For a thorough account of the procedural background of this case, see the District Court's opinion. COPPAR v. Rizzo
    Search
  35. Lankford v. Gelston
    Search
  36. and that the relief contemplated by the earlier orders of March 14, 1973, see COPPAR v. Rizzo
    Search
  37. the limits of logic, may produce untoward results in other circumstances on a future day. See Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter
    Search
  38. and of an official indifference as to doing anything about it. The case, accordingly, plainly fits the mold of Allee v. Medrano
    Search
  39. U. S. 802 (1974), and Hague v. CIO
    Search
  40. ante at 423 U. S. 371 -372, as to whether there is a case or controversy here, citing O'Shea v. Littleton
    Search
  41. reaches not only the acts of an official, but also the acts of subordinates for whom he is responsible. In Monroe v. Pape
    Search
  42. for failure to supervise subordinates. United States v. Park
    Search
  43. of the unconstitutional conduct of their subordinates and fail to prevent a recurrence of such misconduct. Hague v. CIO
    Search
  44. Schnell v. City
    Search
  45. of Chicago, 407 F.2d 1084, 1086 (CA7 1969). See also Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt
    Search
  46. F.2d 11961 1199 (CA1), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 977 (1974), and Rozecki v. Gaughan
    Search
  47. Wright v. McMann
    Search
  48. Lewis v. Kugler
    Search
  49. Jennings v. Patterson
    Search
  50. Smith v. Ross
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial