Citation network
United States Vs. Watson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 26, 1976
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 411 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. WatsonSearch
-
U.S. 411 (1976) United States v. WatsonSearch
-
arrested. He was removed from the restaurant to the street, where he was given the warnings required by Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
the independent ground that the two credit cards were the inadmissible fruits of an unconstitutional arrest. Cf. Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 267 U. S. 132 , 267 U. S. 156 (1925). In Henry v. UnitedSearch
-
there was a warrant or whether there was time to get one, but whether there was probable cause for the arrest. In Abel v. UnitedSearch
-
The crucial question in Draper v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 358 U. S. 310 . Ker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Page 423 U. S. 419 Samuel v. PayneSearch
-
Beckwith v. PhilbySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 487 , 115 U. S. 504 (1885). In Rohan v. SawinSearch
-
Id. at 286. Other early cases to similar effect were Wakely v. HartSearch
-
Tolley v. MixSearch
-
State v. BrownSearch
-
Johnson v. StateSearch
-
Wade v. ChafeeSearch
-
R.I. 224 (1865). See Reuck v. McGregorSearch
-
Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. CainSearch
-
H.R.Rep. No. 283, 74th Cong., 1st Sess., 1 (1935). See United States v. RiggsSearch
-
about probable cause may be more readily accepted where backed by a warrant issued by a magistrate. See United States v. VentrescaSearch
-
Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
inspectors' duties have been thought to permit arrest without a warrant upon probable cause. Compare United States v. HelbockSearch
-
F.Supp. 985 (Ore.1948), with United States v. AlexanderSearch
-
Kelley v. DunneSearch
-
and United States v. BellSearch
-
a warrantless arrest by a postal inspector could be upheld by resort to a citizen's power to arrest. United States v. DeCaturSearch
-
Neggo v. UnitedSearch
-
Ward v. UnitedSearch
-
striking down warrantless arrests by postal inspectors as not authorized by federal statute or by state law, Alexander v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ModerackiSearch
-
In the case before us, the Court of Appeals relied heavily, but mistakenly, on Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443 , 403 U. S. 480 -481 (1971), for, as we noted in Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
Re, 332 U. S. 581 , 332 U. S. 589 (1948). Accord, Miller v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Bad Elk v. UnitedSearch
-
and the amendment was given effect by the courts in accordance with its terms. Compare United States v. CoplonSearch
-
F.2d 629, 633-636 (CA2 1950), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 920 (1952), with Coplon v. UnitedSearch
-
the case could be disposed of on the ground that respondent's consent to the search was plainly voluntary. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
even on the assumption that the preceding warrantless arrest was unconstitutional, and that the doctrine of Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 371 U. S. 471 (1963), therefore was applicable. See Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
cases involving warrantless arrests supports the position of respondent and the Court of Appeals. See, e.g., Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
exceptional circumstances. Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. WatsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial