Citation network
Time, Inc. Vs. Firestone
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 02, 1976
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 448 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Time, Inc. v. FirestoneSearch
-
U.S. 448 (1976) Time, Inc. v. FirestoneSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The standard enunciated in New York Times Co. v. SullivanSearch
-
Gertz v. RobertSearch
-
as that term is defined in New York Times Co. v. SullivanSearch
-
extending New York Times to defamation suits brought by such individuals, see, e.g., Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSearch
-
standard even if the story is proved to be defamatorily false or inaccurate. We reject both arguments. In Gertz v. RobertSearch
-
Were we to accept this reasoning, we would reinstate the doctrine advanced in the plurality opinion in Rosenbloom v. MetromediaSearch
-
of truthful information contained in official court records open to public inspection. Cox Broadcasting Corp v. CohnSearch
-
in an uninhibited press and its equally compelling need for judicial redress of libelous utterances. Cf. Chaplinsky v. NewSearch
-
Rosenblatt v. BaerSearch
-
U. S. 459 because the record contained sufficient evidence to establish the ground of extreme cruelty. Firestone v. FirestoneSearch
-
We have no warrant for reexamining this determination. Cf. Lincoln v. PowerSearch
-
is clear and convincing evidence of the negligence in certain segments of the news media in gathering the news. Gertz v. WelchSearch
-
we normally accord findings of state courts deference in reviewing constitutional claims here. See, e.g., Lyons v. OklahomaSearch
-
fault, we are not inclined to canvass the record to make such a determination in the first instance. Cf. Rosenblatt v. BaerSearch
-
which to thrust herself to the forefront of some unrelated controversy in order to influence its resolution. See Gertz v. RobertSearch
-
that a rational interpretation of an ambiguous document is constitutionally protected under our decision in Time, Inc. v. PapeSearch
-
with whom MR. JUSTICE STEWART joins, concurring. A clear majority of the Court adheres to the principles of Gertz v. RobertSearch
-
Id. at 418 U. S. 348 , quoting Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSearch
-
a factor that may be considered in assessing whether there was actionable fault by Time under Gertz. Cf. Cantrell v. ForestSearch
-
the results of a public judicial proceeding. I In a series of cases beginning with New York Times Co. v. SullivanSearch
-
necessary to a civilized society, Rosenblatt v. BaerSearch
-
is no part of the expression protected by the central meaning of the First Amendment, Garrison v. LouisianaSearch
-
Page 424 U. S. 473 Identical considerations led the Court last Term, in Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSearch
-
from inadvertent error in reporting such proceedings. II It is true, of course, that the Court in Gertz v. RobertSearch
-
of application of the New York Times privilege as it had evolved through the plurality opinion in Rosenbloom v. MetromediaSearch
-
n defamation actions, absent actual malice as defined in New York Times Co. v. SullivanSearch
-
U.S. at 331 U. S. 375 . See also Pennekamp v. FloridaSearch
-
Meiklejohn, Public Speech in the Supreme Court Since New York Times v. SullivanSearch
-
of a public official, Garrison v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 64 , 379 U. S. 77 (1964), or a candidate for public office, Monitor Patriot Co. v. RoySearch
-
Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSearch
-
Amendment values at stake, of more serious concern than an erroneous judgment in the opposite direction, Rosenbloom v. MetromediaSearch
-
as to their truth. St. Amant v. ThompsonSearch
-
Eaton, The American Law of Defamation through Gertz v. RobertSearch
-
Cf. Rosenbloom v. MetromediaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial