Citation network
Ristaino Vs. Ross
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 03, 1976
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 589 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
U.S. 589 (1976) Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT Syllabus Absent circumstances comparable in significance to those existing in Ham v. SouthSearch
-
questions directed to general bias or prejudice. The narrow issue is whether, under our recent decision in Ham v. SouthSearch
-
about racial prejudice. This contention was rejected by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Commonwealth v. RossSearch
-
the Supreme Judicial Court again affirmed Ross' conviction. Commonwealth v. RossSearch
-
Connors v. UnitedSearch
-
Aldridge v. UnitedSearch
-
by this Court that a State had denied a defendant due process by failing to impanel an impartial jury. See Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
Avery v. GeorgiaSearch
-
part in the consideration or decision of this case. MR. JUSTICE WHITE concurs in the result on the ground that Ham v. SouthSearch
-
by the Sixth Amendment as applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 145 (1968). Principles of due process also guarantee a defendant an impartial jury. See, e.g., Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
could encompass questions concerning other factors, such as religious affiliation or national origin. See Aldridge v. UnitedSearch
-
a court of law may turn upon the pigmentation of skin, the accident of birth, or the choice of religion. See Connors v. UnitedSearch
-
supervisory power, we would have required as much of a federal court faced with the circumstances here. See Aldridge v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WalkerSearch
-
guidelines to Massachusetts trial courts for questioning about racial prejudice on voir dire. Commonwealth v. LumleySearch
-
Commonwealth v. RossSearch
-
o deny this petition for certiorari is to see our decision in Ham v. SouthSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ristaino v. RossSearch
-
Ham v. SouthSearch
-
the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Commonwealth v. RossSearch
-
See Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
Avery v. GeorgiaSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment. Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
See Aldridge v. UnitedSearch
-
See Connors v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WalkerSearch
-
Commonwealth v. LumleySearch
-
Irvin v. DowdSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial