Citation network
Singleton Vs. Wulff
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 23, 1976
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 106 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Singleton v. WulffSearch
-
U.S. 106 (1976) Singleton v. WulffSearch
-
Wulff v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed. 508 F.2d 1211 (1974). It reasoned that Roe v. WadeSearch
-
U. S. 113 (1973), and Doe v. BoltonSearch
-
citing Nyberg v. CitySearch
-
ibid., quoting Data Processing Service v. CampSearch
-
distinct standing questions are presented. We have distinguished them in prior cases, e.g., Data Processing Service v. CampSearch
-
is classically adverse, and there clearly exists between them a case or controversy in the constitutional sense. Simon v. EasternSearch
-
Investment Co. Institute v. CampSearch
-
Data Processing Service v. CampSearch
-
them or will be able to enjoy them regardless of whether the in court litigant is successful or not. See Ashwander v. TVASearch
-
to the extent they will be bound by the courts' decisions under the doctrine of stare decisis. See, e.g., Baker v CarrSearch
-
U.S. at 346 U. S. 255 . See also Flast v. CohenSearch
-
such that the former is fully, or very nearly, as effective a proponent of the right as the latter. Thus, in Griswold v. ConnecticutSearch
-
if they could not be asserted in such a case. Id. at 381 U. S. 481 . See also Eisenstadt v. BairdSearch
-
A doctor-patient relationship similar to that in Griswold existed in Doe v. BoltonSearch
-
to him, and the party who is in court becomes, by default, the right's best available proponent. Thus, in NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Id. at 357 U. S. 459 . See also Eisenstadt v. BairdSearch
-
the constitutionally protected abortion decision is one in which the physician is intimately involved. See Roe v. WadeSearch
-
general rule, of course, that a federal appellate court does not consider an issue not passed upon below. In Hormel v. HelveringSearch
-
is justified in resolving an issue not passed on below, as where the proper resolution is beyond any doubt, see Turner v. CitySearch
-
Planned Parenthood of Missouri v. DanforthSearch
-
ante p. 428 U. S. 52 , Bellotti v. BairdSearch
-
We have reiterated that holding today in Planned Parenthood of Missouri v. DanforthSearch
-
have sought a declaration of its invalidity or an injunction against its enforcement. The Association members in NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
We have allowed jus tertii assertion where the interference was no more direct than it is here. In Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
it. See Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
if proved,would give respondents a personal stake in the controversy over the statute's constitutionality. See Warth v. SeldinSearch
-
Simon v. EasternSearch
-
as courts may decide only actual cases and controversies between the parties who stand before the court. See Simon v. EasternSearch
-
courts when policing their own exercise of power in this manner is one of cautious reserve. See generally Ashwander v. TVASearch
-
See Barrows v. JacksonSearch
-
United States v. RichardsonSearch
-
these physicians to assert their patients' rights. A Our prior decisions are enlightening. In Barrows v. JacksonSearch
-
to set up the buyers' rights to equal protection in defense against a damages action by the covenantees. See Shelley v. KraemerSearch
-
the time little chance of a successful suit based on a covenantor's failure to sell to them. In a second case, NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Singleton v. WulffSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial