Citation network
Ernst and Ernst Vs. Hochfelder
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 30, 1976
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSearch
-
U.S. 185 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSearch
-
U.S. 185 (1976) Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSearch
-
of a private cause of action for violations of the statute and the Rule is now well established. Blue Chip Stamps v. ManorSearch
-
Affiliated Ute Citizens v. UnitedSearch
-
Superintendent of Insurance v. BankersSearch
-
FTC v. BunteSearch
-
b) was intended to proscribe knowing or intentional misconduct. See SEC v. TexasSearch
-
Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833, 868 (CA2 1968) (Friendly, J., concurring), cert. denied sub nom. Coates v. SECSearch
-
Loss, Summary Remarks, 30 Bus.Law. 163, 165 (Special Issue 1975). See also Kohn v. AmericanSearch
-
Acts to protect investors against false and deceptive practices that might injure them. See Affiliated Ute Citizens v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 426 , 377 U. S. 432 -433 (1964). See also SEC v. CapitalSearch
-
gloss to the operative language of the statute quite different from its commonly accepted meaning. See, e.g., Addison v. HollySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 406 U.S. at 406 U. S. 151 , quoting SEC v. CapitalSearch
-
misconduct, and mindful that the language of a statute controls when sufficiently clear in its context, United States v. OregonSearch
-
Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRBSearch
-
in securities. See Blue Chip Stamps, 421 U.S. at 421 U. S. 727 -730. As the Court indicated in SEC v. NationalSearch
-
b)(3)(b)(i). See, e.g., Escott v. BarchrisSearch
-
See, e.g., Fischman Page 425 U. S. 211 v. RaytheonSearch
-
SEC v. TexasSearch
-
Rosenberg v. GlobeSearch
-
Dixon v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 381 U. S. 68 , 381 U. S. 74 (1965), quoting Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. CommissionerSearch
-
b) and related sections of the Acts. See, e.g., Gerstle v. Gamble-SkogmoSearch
-
Lanza v. DrexelSearch
-
it had aided and abetted Nay's fraud. Summary judgment in favor of the Exchange was affirmed on appeal. Hochfelder v. MidwestSearch
-
except two asserted claims based on the fraudulent escrow accounts. These claims ultimately were allowed in SEC v. FirstSearch
-
In support of this holding, the Court of Appeals cited its decision in Hochfelder v. MidwestSearch
-
under the section and the Rule, nor the elements necessary to establish such a cause of action. See, e.g., Brennan v. MidwesternSearch
-
did not specifically foresee that respondents' limited class might suffer from a negligent audit, compare Glanzer v. ShepardSearch
-
N.Y. 236, 135 N.E. 275 (1922), with Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheSearch
-
Rhode Island Hospital Trust Nat. Bank v. SwartzSearch
-
in this case, although it did discuss the loans to Nay and certain other related matters in its opinion in Hochfelder v. MidwestSearch
-
b) and Rule 105. See, e.g., White v. AbramsSearch
-
Myzel v. FieldsSearch
-
Kohler v. KohlerSearch
-
for the truth, or knowing use of some practice to defraud -- is necessary in such an action. See, e.g., Clegg v. ConkSearch
-
b) and Rule 10b-5 actually have involved only negligent conduct. Smallwood v. PearlSearch
-
Kohn v. AmericanSearch
-
b) and Rule 10b-5. Cf. SEC v. CapitalSearch
-
Birnbaum v. NewportSearch
-
Kardon v. NationalSearch
-
Addison v. HollySearch
-
under criminal law. Ferdinand Pecorn, counsel to the committee and a draftsman of S. 2693, Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. ProvidentSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSearch
-
Blue Chip Stamps v. ManorSearch
-
FTC v. BunteSearch
-
See SEC v. TexasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial