Citation network
Baxter Vs. Palmigiano
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 20, 1976
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 308 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Baxter v. PalmigianoSearch
-
U.S. 308 (1976) Baxter v. PalmigianoSearch
-
reached in Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
as to procedures required at prison disciplinary hearings and as to the reach of our recent decision in Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
After an evidentiary Page 425 U. S. 311 hearing, the District Court granted substantial relief. Clutchette v. ProcunierSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
at 537. We granted certiorari and heard the case with No. 74-1194. 421 U.S. 1010 (1975). II In Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
supra, drawing comparisons to Gagnon v. ScarpelliSearch
-
U.S. at 418 U. S. 570 . Relying on Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
U. S. 436 (1966), and Mathis v. UnitedSearch
-
Garrity v. NewSearch
-
Sanitation Men v. SanitationSearch
-
that it may draw an inference of guilt from a defendant's failure to testify about facts relevant to his case. Griffin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Morris v. TravisonoSearch
-
silence in the face of accusation is a relevant fact not barred from evidence by the Due Process Clause. Adamson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Bilokumsky v. TodSearch
-
Raffel v. UnitedSearch
-
Twining v. NewSearch
-
Jersey, 211 U. S. 78 (1908). See also United States v. HaleSearch
-
Grunewald v. UnitedSearch
-
IV In Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
Together with No. 74-1194, Enomoto, Corrections Director, et al. v. ClutchetteSearch
-
Amended Complaint, 1 Record 33 (No. 74-1194). The District Court treated the suit as a class action, Clutchette v. ProcunierSearch
-
certification and identification of the class, the action is not properly a class action. Indianapolis School Comm'rs v. JacobsSearch
-
as the result of a negotiated settlement of litigation in the District Court for the District of Rhode Island. Morris v. TravisonoSearch
-
aware that constitutional attacks on the Rhode Island prison rules might necessitate a three-judge court, see Souza v. TravisonoSearch
-
IV of the Court's opinion simply reaffirm Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
the Government may not use compulsion to elicit self-incriminating statements, see, e.g., Counselman v. HitchcockSearch
-
may not permit the use in a criminal trial of self-incriminating statements elicited by compulsion. See, e.g., Haynes v. WashingtonSearch
-
Murphy v. WaterfrontSearch
-
Garner v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 424 U. S. 648 , 424 U. S. 653 (1976) (emphasis supplied). Malloy v. HoganSearch
-
Id. at 378 U. S. 8 . See Spevack v. KleinSearch
-
compelled answers and evidence derived therefrom in any subsequent criminal case in which he is a defendant. Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 70 , 414 U. S. 78 (1973). See Maness v. MeyersSearch
-
includes information which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence that could lead to prosecution. . . . Hoffman v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 353 U. S. 391 , 353 U. S. 421 (1957), quoting Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
government from compelling an individual to disclose information that might tend to connect him with a crime. Maness v. MeyersSearch
-
II It was this aspect of the privilege that we relied on in a line of cases beginning with Garrity v. NewSearch
-
Jersey, 385 U. S. 493 (1967), and leading up to Lefkowitz v. TurleySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial