Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hills Vs. Gautreaux

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 20, 1976

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 29 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 284 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Hills v. Gautreaux
    Search
  2. U.S. 284 (1976) Hills v. Gautreaux
    Search
  3. A metropolitan area remedy in this case is not impermissible as a matter of law. Milliken v. Bradley
    Search
  4. Gautreaux v. Chicago
    Search
  5. of its new family public housing in predominantly white areas inside Chicago or in Cook County. Gautreaux v. Chicago
    Search
  6. by knowingly sanctioning and assisting CHA's racially discriminatory public housing program. Gautreaux v. Romney
    Search
  7. F.2d 930, 939. Shortly before the Court of Appeals announced its decision, this Court, in Milliken v. Bradley
    Search
  8. We granted certiorari to consider this important question. 421 U.S. 962. II In Milliken v. Bradley
    Search
  9. U.S. at 418 U. S. 738 , quoting Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
    Search
  10. Board of Education, 402 U. S. 1 , 402 U. S. 16 . See Rizzo v. Goode
    Search
  11. North Carolina State Board of Education v. Swann
    Search
  12. Davis v. School
    Search
  13. Comm'rs of Mobile County, 402 U. S. 33 , 402 U. S. 37 . As the Court observed in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
    Search
  14. of the issue of metropolitan area relief in light of this opinion and that of the Supreme Court in Milliken v. Bradley
    Search
  15. but inaction by the City Council had held up the approval of the sites required for their development. See Gautreaux v. Romney
    Search
  16. respect to acquisition of property for housing sites, and did not approve land acquisition for any sites. Gautreaux v. Chicago
    Search
  17. Id. at 830. The Court of Appeals upheld this decision. Gautreaux v. City
    Search
  18. a)(4)(A), (C)(ii) (1970 ed., Supp. IV). See H.R.Rep. No. 93-1114, p. 8 (1974). See also City of Hartford v. Hills
    Search
  19. JUSTICE MARSHALL, with whom MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE join, concurring. I dissented in Milliken v. Bradley
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court Hills v. Gautreaux
    Search
  21. Cook County. Gautreaux v. Chicago
    Search
  22. Gautreaux v. Romney
    Search
  23. II In Milliken v. Bradley
    Search
  24. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
    Search
  25. See Rizzo v. Goode
    Search
  26. See Gautreaux v. Romney
    Search
  27. Gautreaux v. City
    Search
  28. City of Hartford v. Hills
    Search
  29. Milliken v. Bradley
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial