Citation network
Hampton Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 27, 1976
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Hampton v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 425 U.S. 484 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Hampton v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 425 U.S. 484 (1976) Hampton v. UnitedSearch
-
defense of entrapment unavailable but also a violation of due process rights cannot properly be claimed. United States v. RussellSearch
-
The Court of Appeals rejected this argument and affirmed the conviction, relying on our opinion in United States v. RussellSearch
-
agent supplied a necessary ingredient in the manufacture of an illicit drug. We reaffirmed the principle of Sorrells v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 287 U. S. 435 (1932), and Sherman v. UnitedSearch
-
principles would absolutely bar the government from invoking judicial processes to obtain a conviction, cf. Rochin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
culpable defendant, but in prosecuting the police under the applicable provisions of state or federal law. See O'Shea v. LittletonSearch
-
plurality opinion, as it would unnecessarily reach and decide difficult questions not before us. In United States v. RussellSearch
-
See Rochin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Sherman v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
yet to confront Government overinvolvement in areas outside the realm of contraband offenses. Cf. United States v. ArcherSearch
-
Sorrells v. UnitedSearch
-
Further, it is an essential ingredient in that manufacturing process and is very difficult to obtain. United States v. RussellSearch
-
was first recognized in the context of simple solicitation of an individual to sell contraband. See, e.g., Sherman v. UnitedSearch
-
in contraband offenses has reached more intensive levels than those revealed in this Court's cases. See Greene v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. RussellSearch
-
Sherman v. UnitedSearch
-
of judgments as to when such fairness has been denied an accused in light of all the circumstances. See, e.g., Rochin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Ham v. SouthSearch
-
a sufficient reason to deny the federal judiciary's power to make them when warranted by the circumstances. Rochin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Sherman v. UnitedSearch
-
Rochin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
by law enforcement authorities in dealing effectively with an expanding narcotics traffic, cf. United States v. RussellSearch
-
concur, dissenting. I joined my Brother STEWART's dissent in United Page 425 U. S. 496 States. v. RussellSearch
-
S. 423 , 411 U. S. 439 (1973), and Mr. Justice Frankfurter's opinion concurring in the result in Sherman v. UnitedSearch
-
S. 369 , 356 U. S. 378 (1958). Those opinions and the separate opinion of Mr. Justice Roberts in Sorrells v. UnitedSearch
-
activity involved in this case, while the Government was not similarly involved in Russell's crime. See Greene v. UnitedSearch
-
him to another agent as a potential purchaser, the Government's role has passed the point of toleration. United States v. WestSearch
-
nothing less than buying contraband from itself through an intermediary and jailing the intermediary. United States v. BuenoSearch
-
individuals, yet that is precisely what set-ups like the instant one are intended to accomplish. Cf. United States v. RussellSearch
-
the contraband that the defendant is convicted of selling, there is entrapment as a matter of law. United States v. BuenoSearch
-
supra. That court has also concluded that this holding was not affected by Russell. See, e.g., United States v. OquendoSearch
-
United States v. WestSearch
-
Cf. Olmstead v. UnitedSearch
-
Casey v. UnitedSearch
-
or (2) that the defendant would have obtained the contraband elsewhere to complete the transaction. Cf. United States v. WestSearch
-
United States v. BuenoSearch
-
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit also followed Bueno in United States v. McGrathSearch
-
and the Court of Appeals apparently concluded that Bueno did not survive Russell. United States v. McGrathSearch
-
the putative pusher is worth the investigative effort only if he has ready access to a supply. See United States v. RussellSearch
-
U. S. 445 n. 3 (STEWART, J., dissenting), some state courts have adopted the objective approach. See, e.g., State v. MullenSearch
-
People v. TurnerSearch
-
Lynn v. StateSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hampton v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. RussellSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial