Citation network
Henderson Vs. Morgan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 17, 1976
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 637 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
U.S. 637 (1976) Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
Supreme Court of New York on May 29, 1971. On March 7, 1972, the Appellate Division affirmed without opinion, People v. MorganSearch
-
McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
the accused does not understand the nature of the constitutional protections that he is waiving, see, e.g., Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
him, or proof that he, in fact, understood the charge, the plea cannot be voluntary in this latter sense. Smith v. O'GradySearch
-
Thomas v. PeopleSearch
-
Stokes v. PeopleSearch
-
People v. CookeSearch
-
U. S. 283 , 420 U. S. 299 (1975) (WHITE, J., dissenting) (emphasis added). We said in Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
In McMann v. RichardsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
it is he who must be informed of the consequences of his plea and what it is that he waives when he pleads, Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
since the defendant entered his plea, I am at a loss to know what case, other than this one, established it. McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
do so. That case involved only a construction of Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 11, and has no application to the States. Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
of establishing the defendant's factual guilt. The only case which arguably addresses the issue in this case is Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
except with a full understanding of the charges against him . . . was at the heart of our recent decisions in McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, and Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
against a defendant on his intelligent plea of guilty accompanied by a claim of innocence. We said in North Carolina v. AlfordSearch
-
which were not set forth in any document which had been read to the defendant or to which he had access. See McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
announced by this Court in McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
Procedure. Yet that case has been held to have only prospective application even as to the federal courts. Halliday v. UnitedSearch
-
S. at 394 U. S. 471 . But, prior to McCarthy, and to this Court's decision of a related issue in Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
the generally accepted standard for a valid guilty plea in federal courts was set forth in Machibroda v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 368 U. S. 487 , 368 U. S. 493 (1962), which, in turn, relied on Kercheval v. UnitedSearch
-
coercion, and respondent was represented by not one, but two, admittedly capable defense attorneys. While McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
or even in every case that the consequences of the plea be enunciated. E.g., United States v. CariolaSearch
-
McGrady v. CunninghamSearch
-
Kennedy v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SwagertySearch
-
ante at 426 U. S. 645 , citing the pre- Boykin case of Smith v. O'GradySearch
-
in turn, depends upon the sort of advice reasonably competent counsel would have been expected to give him, see Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 397 U. S. 742 , 397 U. S. 756 -757 (1970), and McMann v. RichardsonSearch
-
of those elements. Ante at 426 U. S. 646 . But it is quite clear under our decision in North Carolina v. AlfordSearch
-
In Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Henderson v. MorganSearch
-
People v. MorganSearch
-
Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
the States. Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
and Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
See McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
Halliday v. UnitedSearch
-
Machibroda v. UnitedSearch
-
Kercheval v. UnitedSearch
-
While McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial