Citation network
Doyle Vs. Ohio
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 17, 1976
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 610 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Doyle v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. 610 (1976) Doyle v. OhioSearch
-
the course of their state criminal trials petitioners, who, after arrest, were given warnings in line with Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
a question left open last Term in United States v. HaleSearch
-
position, the State emphasizes the importance of cross-examination Page 426 U. S. 617 in general, see Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
that were inadmissible as evidence of guilt because of an officer's failure to follow Miranda's dictates. Harris v. NewSearch
-
Walder v. UnitedSearch
-
The warnings mandated by that case, as a prophylactic means of safeguarding Fifth Amendment rights, see Michigan v. TuckerSearch
-
See United States v. HaleSearch
-
Page 426 U. S. 619 MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concurring in the judgment in United States v. HaleSearch
-
Together with No. 75-5015, Wood v. OhioSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Trial transcript in Ohio v. WoodSearch
-
Trial transcript in Ohio v. DoyleSearch
-
function of a trial by presenting tailored defenses insulated from effective challenge. See generally Fitzpatrick v. UnitedSearch
-
Post at 426 U. S. 621 . But in United States v. HaleSearch
-
A somewhat analogous situation was presented in Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
the federal courts. But the necessity for elementary fairness is not unique to the federal criminal system. Cf. Raley v. OhioSearch
-
story, but rather to challenge the defendant's testimony as to his behavior following arrest. Cf. United States v. FairchildSearch
-
cross-examination about their silence at the time of arrest, petitioners primarily rely on the statement in Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
it belied their trial testimony. Second, the dictum in the footnote in Miranda relies primarily upon Griffin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
prohibited the prosecution's use of the defendant's silence in its case in chief. But as long ago as Raffel v. UnitedSearch
-
Moreover, Mr. Chief Justice Warren, the author of the Court's opinion in Miranda, joined the opinion in Walder v. UnitedSearch
-
Nevertheless, unless and until this Court overrules Raffel v. UnitedSearch
-
No. 10656, Common Pleas Court, Tuscarawas County, Ohio (hereafter Doyle Tr.), 269. Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
See Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
Alderman v. UnitedSearch
-
therefore, use at trial the fact that he stood mute or claimed his privilege in the face of accusation. Cf. Griffin v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Developments in the Law -- Confessions, 79 Harv.L.Rev. 935, 1041-1044 (1966). See also Bram v. UnitedSearch
-
relevant cross-examination without the right to reclaim Fifth Amendment protection on a selective basis. Fitzpatrick v. UnitedSearch
-
Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
has more to gain and less to lose than an ordinary witness from fabrications upon the witness stand. Cf. Reagan v. UnitedSearch
-
Taylor v. UnitedSearch
-
has allowed evidence to be used for impeachment purposes that would be inadmissible as evidence of guilt. In Walder v. UnitedSearch
-
although such evidence clearly was inadmissible for any purpose in the prosecution's case in chief. In Harris v. NewSearch
-
a lawyer, but before he had been furnished with counsel as Miranda requires in such circumstances. Oregon v. HassSearch
-
Harris v. NewSearch
-
Supp. 1973). Indeed, if a defendant has been indicated, no hearing need be held. State v. MorrisSearch
-
of this Court's supervisory powers, have diminished the force of Raffel in the federal courts. United States v. HaleSearch
-
Stewart v. UnitedSearch
-
Grunewald v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Doyle v. OhioSearch
-
Walder v. UnitedSearch
-
Michigan v. TuckerSearch
-
Wood v. OhioSearch
-
Ohio v. WoodSearch
-
Ohio v. DoyleSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial