Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Union Elec. Co. Vs. Epa

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 25, 1976

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 36 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 246 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Union Elec. Co. v. EPA
    Search
  2. U.S. 246 (1976) Union Electric Co. v. Environmental
    Search
  3. the history and provisions of the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, Pub.L. 91-604, 84 Stat. 1676, in detail in Train v. Natural
    Search
  4. considered and rejected the contrary or partially contrary holdings of three other Circuits. Buckeye Power, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  5. Appalachian Power Co. v. EPA
    Search
  6. Duquesne Light Co. v. EPA
    Search
  7. Getty Oil Co. v. Ruckelshaus
    Search
  8. F.2d 349 (CA3 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1125 (1973). See also St. Joe Minerals Corp. v. EPA
    Search
  9. the Eighth Circuit found support for its position in the decisions of several other Circuits. South Terminal Corp. v. EPA
    Search
  10. Texas v. EPA
    Search
  11. Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA
    Search
  12. F.2d 905, 914 (CA9 1974). See also Indiana Michigan Electric Co. v. EPA
    Search
  13. F.2d 839, 843-845 (CA7 1975). Cf. Buckeye Power, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  14. and we have previously accorded great deference to the Administrator's construction of the Clean Air Act. See Train v. NRDC
    Search
  15. Train v. NRDC
    Search
  16. makes it quite clear that the Administrator is not to be concerned with factors other than those specified, Train v. NRDC
    Search
  17. National Coal Operators' Assn. v. Kleppe
    Search
  18. See Train v. NRDC
    Search
  19. So long as the national standards are met, the State may select whatever mix of control devices it desires, Train v. NRDC
    Search
  20. f). See Train v. NRDC
    Search
  21. was necessary for the exercise of its jurisdiction. 515 F.2d 206, 220 (1975). See also Oljato Chapter of Navajo Tribe v. Train
    Search
  22. c). Cf. District of Columbia v. Train
    Search
  23. South Terminal Corp. v. EPA
    Search
  24. may in certain circumstances raise a defense of economic or technological infeasibility. See Buckeye Power, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  25. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. EPA
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Union Elec. Co. v. EPA
    Search
  27. Union Electric Co. v. Environmental
    Search
  28. Train v. Natural
    Search
  29. Circuits. Buckeye Power, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  30. St. Joe Minerals Corp. v. EPA
    Search
  31. Circuits. South Terminal Corp. v. EPA
    Search
  32. Cf. Buckeye Power, Inc. v. EPA
    Search
  33. of the Clean Air Act. See Train v. NRDC
    Search
  34. Oljato Chapter of Navajo Tribe v. Train
    Search
  35. Cf. District of Columbia v. Train
    Search
  36. See Buckeye Power, Inc. v. EPA
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial