Citation network
Sosna Vs. Iowa
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 14, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 393 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
U.S. 393 (1975) Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and who, upon certification of the class action, acquired a legal status separate from her asserted interest. Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
as of the State's desire to insulate its divorce decrees from the likelihood of successful collateral attack. Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
in that sense, but residence in the State for one year. See Vlandis v. KlineSearch
-
Moreover, no total deprivation of access to divorce courts, but only delay in such access, is involved here. Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
States District Court should have proceeded to the merits of the constitutional issue presented in light of Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
and the fact that she has obtained a divorce elsewhere would make this case moot, and require dismissal. Alton v. AltonSearch
-
SEC v. MedicalSearch
-
of the view that this factor significantly affects the mootness determination. In Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICCSearch
-
U. S. 498 (1911), where a challenged ICC order had expired, and in Moore v. OgilvieSearch
-
restrictions for the period necessary to see such a lawsuit to its conclusion. This problem was present in Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
contended that his challenge to the county requirement was moot. The District Court rejected this argument, Blumstein v. EllingtonSearch
-
Vaughan v. BowerSearch
-
the class which he or she seeks to represent at the time the class action is certified by the district court. Bailey v. PattersonSearch
-
Cases decided by this Court over a period of more than a century bear witness to this historical fact. In Barber v. BarberSearch
-
In Pennoyer v. NeffSearch
-
and the same view was reaffirmed in Simms v. SimmsSearch
-
to have much the same meaning as is ordinarily associated with the concept of domicile. Korsrud v. KorsrudSearch
-
those who have recently exercised their right to travel to Iowa, thereby contravening the Court's holdings in Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
and Memorial Hospital v. MaricopaSearch
-
residence, and therefore denies such residents access to the only method of legally dissolving their marriage. Vlandis v. KlineSearch
-
reasonably be justified on grounds other than purely budgetary considerations or administrative convenience. Cf. Kahn v. ShevinSearch
-
Williams v. NorthSearch
-
an individualized determination of residency violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Vlandis v. KlineSearch
-
Id. at 412 U. S. 452 . See Starns v. MalkersonSearch
-
but residence in the State for a year in order for its courts to exercise their divorce jurisdiction. In Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
of sovereign immunity in the District Court would not have barred Iowa from raising that issue in this Court, Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
Ford Motor Co. v. DepartmentSearch
-
any defense of sovereign immunity by entering a voluntary appearance and defending a suit on the merits. McKeown v. BrownSearch
-
Our request that the parties address themselves to Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
a). Cf. Zahn v. InternationalSearch
-
the problems associated with a Rule 23(b)(3) class action, which were considered by this Court last Term in Eisen v. CarlisleSearch
-
This has been the prevailing view in the Circuits. See, e.g., Cleaver v. WilcoxSearch
-
Rivera v. FreemanSearch
-
Conover v. MontemuroSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial