Citation network
Schlesinger Vs. Ballard
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 15, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 498 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Schlesinger v. BallardSearch
-
U.S. 498 (1975) Schlesinger v. BallardSearch
-
on sex in violation of the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause. A three-judge District Court, relying on Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
F.Supp. 167. Thereafter, the case came before the three-judge court for decision on the merits. Relying upon Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
that Congress has acted unconstitutionally, appellee relies primarily upon the Court's recent decisions in Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
U. S. 677 , and Reed v. ReedSearch
-
Id. at 411 U. S. 690 -691. The case of Reed v. ReedSearch
-
H.R.Rep. No. 216, supra, at 5. Cf. Kahn v. ShevinSearch
-
Toth v. QuarlesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 11 , 350 U. S. 17 . See also Orloff v. WilloughbySearch
-
U. S. 497 , 347 U. S. 499 . See also Schneider v. RuskSearch
-
legislative classification that is premised solely upon gender must be subjected to close judicial scrutiny. Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
readiness Page 419 U. S. 520 of our Armed Forces for battle cannot settle the issue before us. As Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
exercised our imaginations to conceive of possible rational justifications for statutory classifications, see McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
declined to manufacture justifications in order to save an apparently invalid statutory classification. Cf. James v. StrangeSearch
-
Weber v. AetnaSearch
-
interests to determine whether they were, in fact, the legislative purpose of a statutory classification, Eisenstadt v. BairdSearch
-
s stated purposes when these purposes are clearly set out in the statute or its legislative history. Johnson v. RobisonSearch
-
In neither Reed v. ReedSearch
-
U. S. 71 (1971), nor Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
system can distinguish Reed or Frontiero. See also James v. StrangeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Schlesinger v. BallardSearch
-
and Reed v. ReedSearch
-
of Reed v. ReedSearch
-
Cf. Kahn v. ShevinSearch
-
As Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
Cf. James v. StrangeSearch
-
Johnson v. RobisonSearch
-
James v. StrangeSearch
-
Schneider v. RuskSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial