Citation network
Drope Vs. Missouri
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 19, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 162 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Drope v. MissouriSearch
-
U.S. 162 (1975) Drope v. MissouriSearch
-
comported with the requirements Page 420 U. S. 170 of Pate v. RobinsonSearch
-
U. S. 375 (1966), and that the test of incompetence to stand trial was that stated in Dusky v. UnitedSearch
-
the court held that Pate v. RobinsonSearch
-
See Youtsey v. UnitedSearch
-
Foote, A Comment on Pre-Trial Commitment of Criminal Defendants, 108 U.Pa.L.Rev. 832, 834 (1960). See Thomas v. CunninghamSearch
-
Dusky v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 362 U.S. at 362 U. S. 402 . In Pate v. RobinsonSearch
-
was the conclusion that the statutory procedure, if followed, was constitutionally adequate. See, e.g., United States v. KnohlSearch
-
Evans v. LaValleeSearch
-
U.S. at 383 U. S. 385 . See United States v. MarshallSearch
-
the respective burdens of the individual and the State and to delimit the scope of state appellate review. Cf. Hawk v. OlsonSearch
-
Conner v. WingoSearch
-
Greenwood v. UnitedSearch
-
to more than one legal issue, each governed by distinct rules reflecting quite different policies. See Jackson v. IndianaSearch
-
be resolved. While we have expressed doubt that the right to further inquiry upon the question can be waived, see Pate v. RobinsonSearch
-
Note, 81 Harv.L.Rev. at 469, we concluded in Pate v. RobinsonSearch
-
Moore v. UnitedSearch
-
of his competence to stand trial to require further inquiry on the question. The import of our decision in Pate v. RobinsonSearch
-
to an act which suggests a rather substantial degree of mental instability contemporaneous with the trial, see Pate v. RobinsonSearch
-
such a result might have been avoided by prompt psychiatric examination before trial, when it was sought by petitioner. v. OurSearch
-
conduct the remainder of his trial on a capital offense in his enforced absence from a self-inflicted wound. See Diaz v. UnitedSearch
-
it clear that there was an insufficient inquiry to afford a basis for deciding the issue of waiver. Cf. Westbrook v. ArizonaSearch
-
United States v. SilvaSearch
-
Hansford v. UnitedSearch
-
the inherent difficulties of such a nunc pro tunc determination under the most favorable circumstances, see Pate v. RobinsonSearch
-
U.S. at 362 U. S. 403 , we cannot conclude that such a procedure would be adequate here. Cf. Conner v. WingoSearch
-
U. S. 49 , 338 U. S. 51 (1949) (opinion of Frankfurter, J.). See also Culombe v. ConnecticutSearch
-
without question a lawyer's representations concerning the competence of his client, see United States ex rel. Rizzi v. FolletteSearch
-
of the issue of competence to stand trial at an early date best serves both the interests of fairness, see Peyton v. RoweSearch
-
petitioner's wife could not be compelled to testify against him. See State v. DunbarSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Drope v. MissouriSearch
-
of Pate v. RobinsonSearch
-
See Thomas v. CunninghamSearch
-
In Pate v. RobinsonSearch
-
United States v. KnohlSearch
-
Evans v. LaValleeSearch
-
See United States v. MarshallSearch
-
Cf. Hawk v. OlsonSearch
-
See Jackson v. IndianaSearch
-
See Diaz v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Westbrook v. ArizonaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial