Citation network
Cox Broadcasting Corp. Vs. Cohn
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 03, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 469 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSearch
-
U.S. 469 (1975) Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSearch
-
did not, as a matter of law, require judgment for appellants. The court concurred with the statement in Briscoe v. Reader'sSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and the decision in favor of its constitutional validity invokes this Court's appellate jurisdiction. Cf. Garrity v. NewSearch
-
Radio Station WOW, Inc. v. JohsonSearch
-
for all practical purposes, concluded, the judgment of the state court on the federal issue is deemed final. In Mills v. AlabamaSearch
-
Page 420 U. S. 480 Second, there are cases such as Radio Station WOW, supra, and Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
federal question. Older cases in the Court had reached the same result on similar facts. Carondelet Canal & Nav. Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
Court has taken jurisdiction in these circumstances prior to completion of the case in the state courts. California v. StewartSearch
-
U. S. 436 (1966) (decided with Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
Id. at 384 U. S. 498 n. 71. A recent decision in this category is North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy v. Snyder'sSearch
-
has been finally determined by the state courts for purposes of the state litigation. In Construction Laborers v. CurrySearch
-
Hence, the case was, for all practical purposes, concluded in the state tribunals. In Mercantile National Bank v. LangdeauSearch
-
Ibid. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. TornilloSearch
-
could only further harm the operation of a free press. Mills v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 214 , 384 U. S. 221 -222 (1966) (DOUGLAS, J., concurring). See also Organization for a Better Austin v. KeefeSearch
-
pragmatic approach that we have followed in the past in determining finality. Page 420 U. S. 487 See Gillespie v. UnitedSearch
-
has embraced the right in some form since 1905, when the Georgia Supreme Court decided the leading case of Pavesich v. NewSearch
-
and the message of New York Page 420 U. S. 490 Times Co. v. SullivanSearch
-
Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSearch
-
Id. at 379 U. S. 72 n. 8. In similar fashion, Time, Inc. v. HillSearch
-
trials and to bring to bear the beneficial effects of public scrutiny upon the administration of justice. See Sheppard v. MaxwellSearch
-
U. S. 367 , 331 U. S. 374 (1947) (emphasis added). See also Sheppard v. MaxwellSearch
-
of speech and nonspeech elements that might otherwise be open to regulation or prohibition. See United States v. O'BrienSearch
-
Chaplinsky v. NewSearch
-
reliance must rest upon the judgment of those who decide what to publish or broadcast. See Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. TornilloSearch
-
in State v. EvjueSearch
-
Wis. 146, 33 N.W.2d 305 (1948). The South Carolina statute was involved in Nappier v. JeffersonSearch
-
Insurance Co., 322 F.2d 502, 505 (CA4 1963), but no constitutional challenge to the statute was made. In Hunter v. WashingtonSearch
-
North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy v. Snyder'sSearch
-
Drug Stores, Inc., 414 U. S. 156 , 414 U. S. 163 (1973). See also Grays Harbor Co. v. Coats-FordneySearch
-
Gillespie v. UnitedSearch
-
has held that the requirement of finality is to be given a 'practical, rather than a technical, construction.' Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Brown Shoe Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Bronson v. RadroadSearch
-
How. 201, 47 U. S. 203 . Dickinson v. PetroleumSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSearch
-
Briscoe v. Reader'sSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial