Citation network
Serfass Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 03, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Serfass v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 420 U.S. 377 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Serfass v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 420 U.S. 377 (1975) Serfass v. UnitedSearch
-
has no significance unless jeopardy has attached. United States v. SissonSearch
-
Relying on its earlier opinion in United States v. PecoraSearch
-
Page 420 U. S. 383 As to the merits, the Court of Appeals concluded that, in Musser v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. SissonSearch
-
United States v. ApexSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Distributing Co., 270 F.2d 747, 755 (CA9 1959). See United States v. PontoSearch
-
the face of the Criminal Appeals Act by the 1948 amendments were preserved by judicial construction. See United States v. ApexSearch
-
United States v. DistefanoSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 355 U. S. 184 , 355 U. S. 187 -188 (1957). See United States v. JornSearch
-
See United States v. JornSearch
-
at 400 U. S. 480 . In the case of a jury trial, jeopardy attaches when a jury is empaneled and sworn. Downum v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 458 (1973). In a nonjury trial, jeopardy attaches when the court begins to hear evidence. McCarthy v. ZerbstSearch
-
F.2d 640, 642 (CA10 1936). See Wade v. HunterSearch
-
supra, at 400 U. S. 479 . See Kepner v. UnitedSearch
-
not be waived by him without the consent of the Government and of the court. Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 23(a). See Patton v. UnitedSearch
-
Singer v. UnitedSearch
-
its validity. United States v. CovingtonSearch
-
facts outside of the indictment, which facts would constitute a defense on the merits at trial,' United States v. BrewsterSearch
-
that the policies of the Double Jeopardy Clause would be frustrated by further prosecution. Cf. United States v. VelazqezSearch
-
the policies of the Double Jeopardy Clause would, in fact, be frustrated by further prosecution. See United States v. PontoSearch
-
rules in the interpretation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Illinois v. SomervilleSearch
-
Ibid. Cf. United States v. SissonSearch
-
an accused is often spared much of the expense, delay, strain, and embarrassment which attend a trial. See Green v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WilsonSearch
-
ante, at 420 U. S. 352 . See United States v. JornSearch
-
Kepner v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 195 U.S. at 195 U. S. 133 . See Price v. GeorgiaSearch
-
States, supra at 355 U. S. 188 . Cf. Kepner v. UnitedSearch
-
Fong Foo v. UnitedSearch
-
cannot be divorced from the procedural context in which the action so characterized was taken. See United States v. WilsonSearch
-
The word itself has no talismanic quality for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Compare United States v. OppenheimerSearch
-
U. S. 85 , 242 U. S. 88 (1916), with United States v. BarberSearch
-
U. S. 72 , 219 U. S. 78 (1911), and United States v. GoldmanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Serfass v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. PecoraSearch
-
Musser v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. PontoSearch
-
See United States v. ApexSearch
-
Downum v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial