Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Kugler Vs. Helfant

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 28, 1975

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

45 entries 9 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Perez Vs. Ledesma US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1971
  2. Samuels Vs. Mackell US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1971
  3. Boyle Vs. Landry US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1971
  4. Dyson Vs. Stein US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1971
  5. Stefanelli Vs. Minard US Supreme Court · Dec 03, 1951
  6. Cleary Vs. Bolger US Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1962
  7. Watson Vs. Buck US Supreme Court · May 26, 1941
  8. Gibson Vs. Berryhill US Supreme Court · May 07, 1973
  9. Cruz Vs. Beto US Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1972
  10. U.S. 117 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Kugler v. Helfant
    Search
  11. U.S. 117 (1975) Kugler v. Helfant
    Search
  12. in the New Jersey state courts. The District Court issued an order dismissing the complaint, on the basis of Younger v. Harris
    Search
  13. criminal proceedings to suppress the use of evidence even when claimed to have been unlawfully obtained, Stefanelli v. Minard
    Search
  14. in the state court system. The District Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the principles of Younger v. Harris
    Search
  15. II In Younger v. Harris
    Search
  16. Ibid. In the companion case of Perez v. Ledesma
    Search
  17. Id. at 401 U. S. 85 . See Mitchum v. Foster
    Search
  18. U. S. 225 , 407 U. S. 230 -231. The policy of equitable restraint expressed in Younger v. Harris
    Search
  19. provides the accused a fair and sufficient opportunity for vindication of federal constitutional rights. See Steffel v. Thompson
    Search
  20. as evidence in that trial. This procedure closely resembles the course rejected by this Court in Stefanelli v. Minard
    Search
  21. Id. at 342 U. S. 120 . Similarly, in Perez v. Ledesma
    Search
  22. U.S. at 401 U. S. 84 -85. See also Cleary v. Bolger
    Search
  23. ordered by the Court of Appeals as it would be by the permanent injunction originally sought by Helfant. See Samuels v. Mackell
    Search
  24. Together with No. 74-277, Helfant v. Kugler
    Search
  25. has been left largely undefined by this Court. In Younger v. Harris
    Search
  26. even in the absence of either harassment or bad faith enforcement of a state criminal statute, by quoting from Watson v. Buck
    Search
  27. Id. at 401 U. S. 54 . Gibson v. Berryhill
    Search
  28. In that case, the Court found it unnecessary to decide whether the rule of Younger v. Harris
    Search
  29. the predicate for a Younger v. Harris
    Search
  30. stated a claim upon which relief could be granted, its factual allegations were to be taken as true. See, e.g., Cruz v. Beto
    Search
  31. means that a prosecution has been brought without a reasonable expectation of obtaining a valid conviction. See Perez v. Ledesma
    Search
  32. The internal quotation is from Douglas v. City
    Search
  33. In Dombrowski v. Pfister
    Search
  34. U.S. Supreme Court Kugler v. Helfant
    Search
  35. of Younger v. Harris
    Search
  36. of Perez v. Ledesma
    Search
  37. See Mitchum v. Foster
    Search
  38. Younger v. Harris
    Search
  39. See Steffel v. Thompson
    Search
  40. Helfant. See Samuels v. Mackell
    Search
  41. Helfant v. Kugler
    Search
  42. Court. In Younger v. Harris
    Search
  43. See Perez v. Ledesma
    Search
  44. Douglas v. City
    Search
  45. Byrne v. Karalexis
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial