Citation network
Gurley Vs. Rhoden
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 12, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 200 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Gurley v. RhodenSearch
-
U.S. 200 (1975) Gurley v. RhodenSearch
-
Brief for Petitioner 37. He cites in support the statement in Hoeper v. TaxSearch
-
violating the constitutional immunity of the United States and its property from taxation by the States. M'Culloch v. MarylandSearch
-
the purchaser-consumer. The Court has laid to rest doubts on that score raised by such decisions as Panhandle Oil Co. v. MississippiSearch
-
Indian Motorcycle Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
and Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. ScurlockSearch
-
schemes, as here, where neither statute required petitioner to pass the tax on to the purchaser-consumer. See Alabama v. KingSearch
-
Lash's Products Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Wheeler Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
First Page 421 U. S. 205 Agricultural Nat. Bank v. TaxSearch
-
such as petitioner and not upon his purchaser-consumer. Martin Oil Service. Inc. v. DepartmentSearch
-
People v. WernerSearch
-
Sun Oil Co. v. GrossSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
State v. ThoniSearch
-
Ga.App. 454, 174 S.E.2d 224, aff'd, 226 Ga. 883, 178 S.E.2d 173 (1970). Contra, see Tax Review Board v. EssoSearch
-
Standard Oil Co. v. StateSearch
-
Standard Oil Co. v. StateSearch
-
First Agricultural Nat. Bank v. TaxSearch
-
the cost should be borne entirely by motorists who use gasoline to drive on the highways. Martin Oil Service, Inc. v. DepartmentSearch
-
excise tax falls. But a State's highest court is the final judicial arbiter of the meaning of state statutes, Alabama v. KingSearch
-
United States v. SharpSearch
-
that the decision of the Mississippi Supreme Court is foreclosed by this Court's decision in Panhandle Oil Co. v. KnoxSearch
-
purchaser. The Court has since expressly abandoned that view, and has accepted the analysis of the dissent. In Alabama v. KingSearch
-
So far as a different view has prevailed, see Panhandle Oil Co. v. KnoxSearch
-
e.g., Pennsylvania, see Tax Review Board v. EssoSearch
-
Emphasis added.) In contrast, the Massachusetts sales tax law before us in First Agricultural Nat. Bank v. TaxSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Gurley v. RhodenSearch
-
Hoeper v. TaxSearch
-
the States. M'Culloch v. MarylandSearch
-
Panhandle Oil Co. v. MississippiSearch
-
See Alabama v. KingSearch
-
Agricultural Nat. Bank v. TaxSearch
-
Martin Oil Service. Inc. v. DepartmentSearch
-
Tax Review Board v. EssoSearch
-
Alabama v. KingSearch
-
United States v. SharpSearch
-
Panhandle Oil Co. v. KnoxSearch
-
In Alabama v. KingSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial