Citation network
Van Lare Vs. Hurley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 19, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 338 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Van Lare v. HurleySearch
-
U.S. 338 (1975) Van Lare v. HurleySearch
-
is barred from assuming that nonlegally responsible persons will apply their resources to aid the welfare child, King v. SmithSearch
-
Lewis v. MartinSearch
-
federal regulations. We conclude that the state provisions conflict with federal law, and are therefore invalid. King v. SmithSearch
-
by the Social Security Act of 1935. Its operation has been described in several recent opinions. See, e.g., Rosado v. WymanSearch
-
King v. SmithSearch
-
seek to qualify for federal AFDC funding must operate a program not in conflict with the Social Security Act. Townsend v. SwankSearch
-
the judgments, and remanded for convention of a three-judge court to decide the constitutional challenges. Taylor v. LavineSearch
-
in No. 74-453, we vacate the judgment in that case and remand with directions to dismiss as moot. Cf. United States v. MunsingwearSearch
-
a) was previously construed in King v. SmithSearch
-
at 392 U. S. 333 . The Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) codified the holding of King v. SmithSearch
-
a). We applied this regulation in Lewis v. MartinSearch
-
a), and King v. SmithSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
may be contributing nothing to Page 421 U. S. 347 the needy child. King v. SmithSearch
-
supra, and Lewis v. MartinSearch
-
But States may not seek to accomplish policies aimed at lodgers by depriving needy children of benefits. King v. SmithSearch
-
Together with No. 74-5054, Taylor et al. v. LavineSearch
-
Petitioner Hurley's action was brought in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. Hurley v. VanSearch
-
Lare, 72 Civ. 3423. Petitioners Taylor and Otey brought their action in the Eastern District of New York. Taylor v. LavineSearch
-
Hurley v. VanSearch
-
Lare, 365 F.Supp. 186 (SDNY 1973). The opinion of the District Judge in Taylor v. LavineSearch
-
See Lewis v. MartinSearch
-
law, for the reasons stated by Judge Hays in his opinion for the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Taylor v. LavineSearch
-
is not constitutionally impermissible, for the reasons set forth by Judge Hays in his dissenting opinion in Hurley v. VanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Van Lare v. HurleySearch
-
the Social Security Act. Townsend v. SwankSearch
-
Taylor v. LavineSearch
-
Cf. United States v. MunsingwearSearch
-
of King v. SmithSearch
-
and King v. SmithSearch
-
and Lewis v. MartinSearch
-
the Southern District of New York. Hurley v. VanSearch
-
the Eastern District of New York. Taylor v. LavineSearch
-
the Second Circuit. Taylor v. LavineSearch
-
Rosado v. WymanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial