Citation network
United States Vs. Wilson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 19, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 309 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. WilsonSearch
-
U.S. 309 (1975) United States v. WilsonSearch
-
The District Court properly imposed summary contempt punishment under the circumstances. Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
well as to provide the recalcitrant witness with some incentive to testify. P. 421 U. S. 316 . (c) Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 421 U. S. 312 and, relying on Goldberg v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 314 Appeals considered itself bound by its own previous decisions, and by this Court's decision in Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. PaceSearch
-
United States v. MarraSearch
-
of Appeals for the Second Circuit apparently conflicts with that of the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, Baker v. EisenstadtSearch
-
here each refusal was in the context of a face-to-face encounter between the judge and respondents. See Illinois v. AllenSearch
-
Cooke v. UnitedSearch
-
proceedings that literally disrupted the progress of the trial, and hence the orderly administration of justice. Yates v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
can be cured swiftly by bodily removing the offender from the courtroom, or by physical restraints, Illinois v. AllenSearch
-
has consistently been recognized to be no more than a restatement of the law existing when the Rule was adopted, Bloom v. IllinoisSearch
-
and the law at that time allowed summary punishment for refusals to testify, Hale v. HenkelSearch
-
Nelson v. UnitedSearch
-
Blair v. UnitedSearch
-
Brown v. WalkerSearch
-
Savin, 131 U. S. 267 (1889). III The Court of Appeals considered itself bound by language in Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
should be used in contempt cases. Anderson v. DunnSearch
-
Wheat. 204, 19 U. S. 231 (1821). See Taylor v. HayesSearch
-
granted was not coextensive with the scope of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
predecessor of the statute was enacted to limit the broad power granted by the Judiciary Act of 1789, 1 Stat. 73. Nye v. UnitedSearch
-
refusals, he would hold them in contempt. He also offered them an opportunity to speak in their own behalf. Groppi v. LeslieSearch
-
In Shillitani v. UnitedSearch
-
of immediate confinement for civil contempt would have provided little incentive for them to testify. Contrast Anglin v. JohnstonSearch
-
App 6. MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST joins, concurring. In Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
within the meaning of Rule 42(a). 359 U.S. at 359 U. S. 47 -52. Less than seven years later, in Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
could have been interrupted to compel them to serve an intervening sentence for contempt. See, e.g., United States v. LiddySearch
-
Anglin v. JohnstonSearch
-
to testify at a trial. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed and remanded on the ground that Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 382 U. S. 162 (1965), and the Court of Appeals' own prior decision in United States v. MarraSearch
-
Page 421 U. S. 325 The Court today declines the Government's invitation to overrule Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
of the dignity of the Page 421 U. S. 327 court.' We start from the premise long ago stated in Anderson v. DunnSearch
-
Johnson v. MississippiSearch
-
have testified as ordered, but requested a different judge for sentencing on the robbery charge. Cf. Goldberg v. UnitedSearch
-
Harris overruled the broader reach given subdivision (a) in Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. MarraSearch
-
Id. at 1202. See also United States v. PaceSearch
-
Panico v. UnitedSearch
-
has broad discretion to specify the time for preparation of a defense to a charge of criminal contempt. See Nilva v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. WilsonSearch
-
Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
Goldberg v. UnitedSearch
-
the First Circuit, Baker v. EisenstadtSearch
-
See Illinois v. AllenSearch
-
Yates v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial