Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Philbrook Vs. Glodgett

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 09, 1975

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

41 entries 9 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians Vs. Fpc US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1975
  2. Shea Vs. Vialpando US Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1974
  3. Burns Vs. Alcala US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1975
  4. Townsend Vs. Swank US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1971
  5. Carleson Vs. Remillard US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1972
  6. Slagle Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · May 15, 1961
  7. Raley Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1959
  8. Mitchell Vs. Maurer US Supreme Court · Dec 03, 1934
  9. Cutler Vs. Rae US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1849
  10. U.S. 707 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Philbrook v. Glodgett
    Search
  11. U.S. 707 (1975) Philbrook v. Glodgett
    Search
  12. United States v. Heirs
    Search
  13. Richards v. United
    Search
  14. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United
    Search
  15. to permit a person to decline resources, for which he is eligible, in order to qualify for AFDC assistance. See Shea v. Vialpando
    Search
  16. to need and be available to a recipient as a matter of right. See California Dept. of Human Resources Development v. Java
    Search
  17. King v. Smith
    Search
  18. U. S. 598 (1972). See also New York Dept. of Social Services v. Dublino
    Search
  19. Moor v. County
    Search
  20. of Alameda, 411 U. S. 693 , 411 U. S. 715 (1973). See also Christian v. New
    Search
  21. to comply with applicable Rules of this Court may result in the dismissal of an appeal of the defaulting party. Sweezy v. New
    Search
  22. must take note of want of jurisdiction in the district court even though neither party has raised the point. Cutler v. Rae
    Search
  23. Clark v. Paul
    Search
  24. Together with No. 74-132, Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Glodett
    Search
  25. a) of the Act, 49 Stat. 629. See generally Burn v. Alcala
    Search
  26. and the parties have filed supplemental briefs on this point. On authority of Gonzalez v. Automatic
    Search
  27. Employees Credit Union, 419 U. S. 90 (1974), and MTM, Inc. v. Baxley
    Search
  28. appellant Philbrook and appellees contend that the appeals are properly before this Court. In Hagans v. Lavine
    Search
  29. the District of Vermont 42-44 (Mar. 5, 1973). Appellant Weinberger urges us to reconsider our decision in Engineers v. Chicago
    Search
  30. U.S. Supreme Court Philbrook v. Glodgett
    Search
  31. See Shea v. Vialpando
    Search
  32. See California Dept. of Human Resources Development v. Java
    Search
  33. New York Dept. of Social Services v. Dublino
    Search
  34. Christian v. New
    Search
  35. Sweezy v. New
    Search
  36. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Glodett
    Search
  37. Burn v. Alcala
    Search
  38. of Gonzalez v. Automatic
    Search
  39. and MTM, Inc. v. Baxley
    Search
  40. Court. In Hagans v. Lavine
    Search
  41. Engineers v. Chicago
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial