Citation network
United States Vs. Park
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 09, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 658 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ParkSearch
-
U.S. 658 (1975) United States v. ParkSearch
-
was convicted, but the Court of Appeals reversed, reasoning that, although this Court's decision in United States v. DotterweichSearch
-
but also, and primarily, a duty to implement measures that will insure that violations will not occur, United States v. DotterweichSearch
-
Smith v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
k), were appropriate under United States v. DotterweichSearch
-
The trial judge denied the motion, stating that United States v. DotterweichSearch
-
s counsel objected to the instructions on the ground that they failed fairly to reflect our decision in United States v. DotterweichSearch
-
F.2d 839, 841 (CA4 1974). It reasoned that, although our decision in United States v. DotterweichSearch
-
need for the evidence, and thus that its prejudicial effect outweighed its relevancy under the test of United States v. WoodsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of liability of corporate officers under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as construed in United States v. DotterweichSearch
-
program. We reverse. I The question presented by the Government's petition for certiorari in United States v. DotterweichSearch
-
United States v. BuffaloSearch
-
Cf. United States v. SullivanSearch
-
are subject to the criminal provisions of the Act was not formulated in a vacuum. Cf. Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
and that responsible corporate agents could be subjected to the liability thereby imposed. See, e.g., United States v. MayfieldSearch
-
relationship he bore to the corporation, the agent had the power to prevent the act complained of. See, e.g., State v. BurnamSearch
-
Overland Cotton Mill Co. v. PeopleSearch
-
Colo. 263, 75 P. 924 (1904). Cf. Groff v. StateSearch
-
Turner v. StateSearch
-
People v. SchwartzSearch
-
United States v. WiesenfeldSearch
-
U. S. 141 , 414 U. S. 146 -147 (1973). See Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BirnbaumSearch
-
F.2d 250, 257 (CA2), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 837 (1967). (Emphasis added.) Cf. Cupp v. NaughtenSearch
-
requested by respondent was an abuse of discretion. See United Page 421 U. S. 676 States v. BayerSearch
-
Holland v. UnitedSearch
-
sua sponte was plain error or a defect affecting substantial rights. Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 52(b). Compare Lopez v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 373 U. S. 427 , 373 U. S. 436 (1963), with Screws v. UnitedSearch
-
That evidence was not offered to show that respondent had a propensity to commit criminal acts, cf. Michelson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 335 U. S. 469 , 335 U. S. 475 -476 (1948), or, as in United States v. WoodsSearch
-
respondent's defense that he had justifiably relied upon subordinates to handle sanitation matters. Cf. United States v. RossSearch
-
we conclude that its relevance and persuasiveness outweighed any prejudicial effect. Cf. Research Laboratories, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Lelles v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. KaadtSearch
-
F.2d 600 (CA7 1948). Cf. United States v. ShapiroSearch
-
United States v. KlehmanSearch
-
he reluctantly concluded Page 421 U. S. 680 that he was required to give such a charge under United States v DotterweichSearch
-
Sparf v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 382 U. S. 403 . And in Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
Cool v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ParkSearch
-
of United States v. WoodsSearch
-
Cf. Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MayfieldSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial