Citation network
Goldfarb Vs. Virginia State Bar
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 16, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Goldfarb v. VirginiaSearch
-
State Bar - 421 U.S. 773 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Goldfarb v. VirginiaSearch
-
State Bar, 421 U.S. 773 (1975) Goldfarb v. VirginiaSearch
-
Parke v. BownSearch
-
within the meaning of Parker v. BrownSearch
-
and enforcement of the schedule by the State Bar was exempt from the Sherman Act as state action as defined in Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Act. Both respondents argued that their actions were also exempt from the Sherman Act as state action. Parker v. BrownSearch
-
id. at 13, the Court of Appeals held the State Bar immune under Parker v. BrownSearch
-
a showing of an actual restraint on trade, would present us with a different question, e.g., American Column Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Maple Flooring Assn. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 268 U. S. 563 , 268 U. S. 580 (1925). But see United States v. NationalSearch
-
fee. The price information disseminated did not concern past standards, cf. Cement Mfrs. Protective Assn. v. UnitedSearch
-
This is not merely a case of an agreement that may be inferred from an exchange of price information, United States v. ContainerSearch
-
All attorneys, of course, were practicing under the constraint of the fee schedule. See generally United States v. ContainerSearch
-
Page 421 U. S. 785 United States v. FrankfortSearch
-
Distilleries, 324 U. S. 293 , 324 U. S. 297 (1945). See United States v. YellowSearch
-
of real estate transactions, we conclude that interstate commerce has been sufficiently affected. See Montague & Co. v. LowrySearch
-
United States v. Women'sSearch
-
and our cases have shown that, once an effect is shown, no specific magnitude need be proved. E.g., United States v. McKessonSearch
-
U. S. 469 , 310 U. S. 501 (1940). See United States v. Socony-VacuumSearch
-
The nature of an occupation, standing alone, does not provide sanctuary from the Sherman Act, Associated Press v. UnitedSearch
-
includes professions. United States v. NationalSearch
-
United States v. South-EasternSearch
-
And our cases have repeatedly established that there is a heavy presumption against implicit exemptions, United States v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
E.g., American Medical Assn. v. UnitedSearch
-
Radovich v. NationalSearch
-
intercourse, and that anticompetitive activities by lawyers may exert a restraint on commerce. D In Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Sherman Act was not meant to proscribe is whether the activity is required by the State acting as sovereign. Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Continental Co. v. UnionSearch
-
Cf. Gibson v. BerryhillSearch
-
Parker v. BrownSearch
-
State Medical Society, 343 U. S. 326 , 343 U. S. 336 (1952). See also Semler v. OregonSearch
-
See Sperry v. FloridaSearch
-
It is in a practical sense that we must view an effect on interstate commerce, Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. AmericanSearch
-
The County Bar relies on United States v. YellowSearch
-
under the antitrust laws. E.g., Federal Club v. NationalSearch
-
FTC v. RaladamSearch
-
Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. NationalSearch
-
that the question was still open, 339 U.S. at 339 U. S. 492 , as we had done earlier in American Medical Assn. v. UnitedSearch
-
In addition, the Supreme Court of Virginia, has inherent power to regulate the practice of law in that State. Button v. DaySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Goldfarb v. VirginiaSearch
-
of Parker v. BrownSearch
-
American Column Co. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial