Citation network
Warth Vs. Seldin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 490 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Warth v. SeldinSearch
-
U.S. 490 (1975) Warth v. SeldinSearch
-
of a showing of any exception allowing such a claim, to raise the putative rights of third parties. Trafficante v. MetropolitanSearch
-
constitutional limitations on federal court jurisdiction and prudential limitations on its exercise. E.g., Barrows v. JacksonSearch
-
in concern about the proper -- and properly limited -- role of the courts in a democratic society. See Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
jurisdiction and to justify exercise of the court's remedial powers on Page 422 U. S. 499 his behalf. Baker v. CarrSearch
-
Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
D., 410 U. S. 614 , 410 U. S. 617 (1973). See Data Processing Service v. CampSearch
-
or a large class of citizens, that harm alone normally does not warrant exercise of jurisdiction. E.g., Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
and interests, and cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third parties. E.g., Tileston v. UllmanSearch
-
U. S. 44 (1943). See United States v. RainesSearch
-
Barrows v. PageSearch
-
and even though judicial intervention may be unnecessary to protect individual rights. See, e.g., Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
standing in no way depends on the merits of the plaintiff's contention that particular conduct is illegal, e.g., Flast v. CohenSearch
-
See Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
judicial power when the plaintiff's claim to relief rests on the legal rights of third parties. See United States v. RainesSearch
-
that the constitutional or statutory provision in question implies a right of action in the plaintiff. See Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
Sullivan v. LittleSearch
-
injury to himself, even if it is an injury shared by a large class of other possible litigants. E.g., United States v. SCRAPSearch
-
interests of others, and, indeed, may invoke the general public interest in support of their claim. E.g., Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
FCC v. SandersSearch
-
allegations of the complaint, and must construe the complaint in favor of the complaining party. E.g., Jenkins v. McKeithenSearch
-
U. S. 488 , 414 U. S. 494 (1974). See, e.g., Bailey v. PattersonSearch
-
that, if the court affords the relief requested, the asserted inability of petitioners will be removed. Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
of the injury does not necessarily deprive the person harmed of standing to vindicate his rights. E.g., Roe v. WadeSearch
-
Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
restriction against the litigant would result indirectly in the violation of third parties' rights. See, e.g., Doe v. BoltonSearch
-
affect a relationship existing between them and the persons whose rights assertedly are violated. E.g., Sullivan v. LittleSearch
-
Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
members, at least so long as the challenged infractions adversely affect its members' associational ties. E.g., NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Anti-Fascist Committee v. McGrathSearch
-
an association may have standing solely as the representative of its members. E.g., National Motor Freight Assn. v. UnitedSearch
-
however, does not eliminate or attenuate the constitutional requirement of a case or controversy. See Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
of the benefits of living in a racially and ethnically integrated community. Referring to our decision in Trafficante v. MetropolitanSearch
-
even where the plaintiff would have suffered no judicially cognizable injury in the absence of statute. Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
D., 410 U.S. at 410 U. S. 617 n. 3, citing Trafficante v. MetropolitanSearch
-
the association must show that it has suffered harm, or that one or more of its members are injured. E.g., Sierra Club v. MortonSearch
-
associations to represent their members, the relief sought has been of this kind. E.g., National Motor Freight Assn. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 372 U. S. 246 (1963). See Data Processing Service v. CampSearch
-
to its members of sufficient immediacy and ripeness to warrant judicial intervention. See, e.g., United Public Workers v. MitchellSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial