Citation network
Rose Vs. Hodges
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 11, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 19 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Rose v. HodgesSearch
-
U.S. 19 (1975) Rose v. HodgesSearch
-
Hodges v. StateSearch
-
citing Bowen v. StateSearch
-
were resolved in favor of sustaining the action of the Governor by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals in Hodges v. StateSearch
-
them to death. The Governor commuted these sentences to a term of 99 years after this Court's decision in Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
resort to further judicial proceedings, the United States Constitution affords no impediment to that choice. Dreyer v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 71 (1902). Cf. Schick v. ReedSearch
-
virtually identical to this one, that no federal constitutional question was presented by such a commutation. Smith v. RoseSearch
-
Bowen v. RoseSearch
-
the state courts. Three (coerced confessions, prejudicial comments during voir dire, Hodge's claim under Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
Hodges v. RoseSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the death penalty and remanding the case to the trial court for punishment determination in the light of Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
for punishment determination in the light of Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
in Mempa v. RhaySearch
-
Also, the due process dimensions of the right to present evidence relevant to sentencing was left open in McGautha v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Neither of the decisions cited by the Court is apposite. Dreyer v. IllinoisSearch
-
Fourteenth Amendment does not bar executive exercise of sentencing powers. Id. at 187 U. S. 84 . Schick v. ReedSearch
-
U. S. 21 n. 3, serve to substantiate my reading of the record. Judge Miller was a member of the panel in Smith v. RoseSearch
-
No. 74-1753 (CA6, Nov. 15, 1974), and Judge Peck participated in Bowen v. RoeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Rose v. HodgesSearch
-
Bowen v. StateSearch
-
Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Dreyer v. IllinoisSearch
-
Cf. Schick v. ReedSearch
-
Smith v. RoseSearch
-
Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
of Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Bowen v. RoeSearch
-
McGautha v. CaliforniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial