Citation network
Rose Vs. Locke
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 17, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 48 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Rose v. LockeSearch
-
U.S. 48 (1975) Rose v. LockeSearch
-
notice that it would be held applicable to acts such as those involved here when such a case as this arose. Wainwright v. StoneSearch
-
U. S. 21 , and Bouie v. CitySearch
-
Wainwright v. StoneSearch
-
Robinson v. UnitedSearch
-
and judicial opinions before they may say with any certainty what some statutes may compel or forbid. Cf. Nash v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. NationalSearch
-
and there can be no contention that the respondent's acts were ones never before considered as such. See, e.g., Comer v. StateSearch
-
State v. TownsendSearch
-
nor do we think he could successfully do so. We have twice before upheld statutes against similar challenges. In State v. CrawfordSearch
-
its terms. We dismissed the appeal from this Judgment as failing to present a substantial federal question. Crawford v. MissouriSearch
-
Hicks v. MirandaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 332 , 422 U. S. 343 -345 (1975). And in Wainwright v. StoneSearch
-
Fisher v. StateSearch
-
Sherrill v. StateSearch
-
Tenn. 427, 429, 321 S.W.2d 811, 812 (1959), quoting from State v. CyrSearch
-
had at that point twice equated with its own, had been applied to cunnilingus before either Tennessee decision. State v. TownsendSearch
-
here when such a case arose. Page 423 U. S. 53 This also serves to distinguish this case from Bouie v. CitySearch
-
threatens a fundamental right such as freedom of speech, so as to call for any special judicial scrutiny, see Smith v. GoguenSearch
-
decisions of which Goodings v. WilsonSearch
-
scope of the phrase. The Tennessee court in that opinion cited a Maine case, decided in 1938, State v. CyrSearch
-
to fellatio. Page 423 U. S. 56 But the Tennessee court did not also cite a 1950 Maine decision, State v. TownsendSearch
-
statute to cunnilingus. Fisher v. StateSearch
-
jurisdictions, though on their State's particular statutory language, have drawn that distinction. See, e.g., Riley v. GarrettSearch
-
State v. TarrantSearch
-
this Court's dismissal for want of a substantial federal question of the appeal in Crawford v. MissouriSearch
-
U.S. 811 (1972), and (2) the Court's per curiam opinion in Wainwright v. StoneSearch
-
State v. CrawfordSearch
-
is not, in itself, vague. Wainwright v. StoneSearch
-
has been granted, I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. This case is not of a piece with Wainwright v. StoneSearch
-
decision would have supported the inference that this conduct was not proscribed by the Tennessee statute. Stephens v. StateSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Rose v. LockeSearch
-
Wainwright v. StoneSearch
-
and Bouie v. CitySearch
-
Cf. Nash v. UnitedSearch
-
Comer v. StateSearch
-
In State v. CrawfordSearch
-
Crawford v. MissouriSearch
-
State v. CyrSearch
-
Bouie v. CitySearch
-
Smith v. GoguenSearch
-
Goodings v. WilsonSearch
-
Riley v. GarrettSearch
-
Stephens v. StateSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial