Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Powell

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 02, 1975

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 5 linked 22 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Mazurie US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1975
    Relied / Followed
  2. United States Vs. Salen US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1914
  3. United States Vs. Stever US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1911
  4. United States Vs. Petrillo US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1947
  5. Sproles Vs. Binford US Supreme Court · May 23, 1932
  6. U.S. 87 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Powell
    Search
  7. U.S. 87 (1973) United States v. Powell
    Search
  8. equally capable of achieving its objective does not mean that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. United States v. Petrillo
    Search
  9. the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 501 F.2d 1136 (1974). Citing Lanzetta v. New
    Search
  10. we find the statute inapplicable to respondent, it will be unnecessary to reach the constitutional question, Dandridge v. Williams
    Search
  11. by evidence of congressional intent over and above the language of the statute. Page 423 U. S. 91 In Gooch v. United
    Search
  12. which could be concealed as readily as pistols or revolvers would not comport with that purpose. Cf. United States v. Alpers
    Search
  13. It is well settled, of course, that such a statute may not constitutionally be applied to any set of facts. Lanzetta v. New
    Search
  14. Connally v. General
    Search
  15. U. S. 385 , 269 U. S. 391 (1926). An example of such a vague statute is found in United States v. Cohen
    Search
  16. is not unconstitutionally vague. Sproles v. Binford
    Search
  17. Nash v. United
    Search
  18. which it sought does not mean that the statute which it, in fact, drafted is unconstitutionally vague. United States v. Petrillo
    Search
  19. would defeat the intention of Congress or render the general statutory language meaningless. See United States v. Alpers
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Powell
    Search
  21. Citing Lanzetta v. New
    Search
  22. Dandridge v. Williams
    Search
  23. In Gooch v. United
    Search
  24. Cf. United States v. Alpers
    Search
  25. Lanzetta v. New
    Search
  26. United States v. Cohen
    Search
  27. See United States v. Alpers
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales